mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Inference over Unseen Entities, Relations and Literals on Knowledge Graphs

arXiv 2410.06742 ↗First posted 9 Oct 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, knowledge graph embedding models have been successfully applied in the transductive setting to tackle various challenging tasks including link prediction, and query answering. Yet, the transductive setting does not allow for reasoning over unseen entities, relations, let alone numerical or non-numerical literals. Although increasing efforts are put into exploring inductive scenarios, inference over unseen entities, relations, and literals has yet to come. This limitation prohibits the existing methods from handling real-world dynamic knowledge graphs involving heterogeneous information about the world. Here, we propose a remedy to this limitation. We propose the attentive byte-pair encoding layer (BytE) to construct a triple embedding from a sequence of byte-pair encoded subword units of entities and relations. Compared to the conventional setting, BytE leads to massive feature reuse via weight tying, since it forces a knowledge graph embedding model to learn embeddings for subword units instead of entities and relations directly. Consequently, the size of the embedding matrices are not anymore bound to the unique number of entities and relations of a knowledge graph. Experimental results show that BytE improves the link prediction performance of 4 knowledge graph embedding models on datasets where the syntactic representations of triples are semantically meaningful. However, benefits of training a knowledge graph embedding model with BytE dissipate on knowledge graphs where entities and relations are represented with plain numbers or URIs. We provide an open source implementation of BytE to foster reproducible research.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Oct 2024.

Builds on

23 of 35 references.

References · 23

  1. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  2. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  3. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  4. 2015Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Unitscited by 2,918
  5. 2018SentencePiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for Neural Text Processingcited by 1,989
  6. 2014Embedding Entities and Relations for Learning and Inference in Knowledge Basescited by 932
  7. 2016Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Predictioncited by 902
  8. 2017Convolutional 2D Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 730
  9. 2018Subword Regularization: Improving Neural Network Translation Models with Multiple Subword Candidatescited by 639
  10. 2020Knowledge Graphscited by 621
  11. 2020How Good is Your Tokenizer? On the Monolingual Performance of Multilingual Language Modelscited by 318
  12. 2019TuckER: Tensor Factorization for Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 290
11 more
  1. 2017DeepPath: A Reinforcement Learning Method for Knowledge Graph Reasoningcited by 266
  2. 2015A Review of Relational Machine Learning for Knowledge Graphscited by 265
  3. 2019Inductive Relation Prediction by Subgraph Reasoningcited by 239
  4. 2019Quaternion Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 175
  5. 2019DRUM: End-To-End Differentiable Rule Mining On Knowledge Graphscited by 175
  6. 2018Canonical Tensor Decomposition for Knowledge Base Completioncited by 150
  7. 2020Complex Query Answering with Neural Link Predictorscited by 99
  8. 2023Towards Foundation Models for Knowledge Graph Reasoningcited by 86
  9. 2017Knowledge Graph Completion via Complex Tensor Factorizationcited by 80
  10. 2021NodePiece: Compositional and Parameter-Efficient Representations of Large Knowledge Graphscited by 72
  11. 2021Convolutional Hypercomplex Embeddings for Link Predictioncited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.