mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

TeleSparse: Practical Privacy-Preserving Verification of Deep Neural Networks

arXiv 2504.19274 ↗First posted 27 Apr 2025cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Verification of the integrity of deep learning inference is crucial for understanding whether a model is being applied correctly. However, such verification typically requires access to model weights and (potentially sensitive or private) training data. So-called Zero-knowledge Succinct Non-Interactive Arguments of Knowledge (ZK-SNARKs) would appear to provide the capability to verify model inference without access to such sensitive data. However, applying ZK-SNARKs to modern neural networks, such as transformers and large vision models, introduces significant computational overhead. We present TeleSparse, a ZK-friendly post-processing mechanisms to produce practical solutions to this problem. TeleSparse tackles two fundamental challenges inherent in applying ZK-SNARKs to modern neural networks: (1) Reducing circuit constraints: Over-parameterized models result in numerous constraints for ZK-SNARK verification, driving up memory and proof generation costs. We address this by applying sparsification to neural network models, enhancing proof efficiency without compromising accuracy or security. (2) Minimizing the size of lookup tables required for non-linear functions, by optimizing activation ranges through neural teleportation, a novel adaptation for narrowing activation functions' range. TeleSparse reduces prover memory usage by 67% and proof generation time by 46% on the same model, with an accuracy trade-off of approximately 1%. We implement our framework using the Halo2 proving system and demonstrate its effectiveness across multiple architectures (Vision-transformer, ResNet, MobileNet) and datasets (ImageNet,CIFAR-10,CIFAR-100). This work opens new directions for ZK-friendly model design, moving toward scalable, resource-efficient verifiable deep learning.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Apr 2025.

Builds on

41 of 88 references.

References · 41

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2017MobileNets: Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks for Mobile Vision Applicationscited by 3,845
  5. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  6. 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
  7. 2024QuaRot: Outlier-Free 4-Bit Inference in Rotated LLMscited by 634
  8. 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
  9. 2019The State of Sparsity in Deep Neural Networkscited by 476
  10. 2022A Systematic Evaluation of Large Language Models of Codecited by 363
  11. 2017Learning to Prune Deep Neural Networks via Layer-wise Optimal Brain Surgeoncited by 221
  12. 2021Training Neural Networks with Fixed Sparse Maskscited by 214
29 more
  1. 2019Stolen Memories: Leveraging Model Memorization for Calibrated White-Box Membership Inferencecited by 175
  2. 2022A Fast Post-Training Pruning Framework for Transformerscited by 162
  3. 2021CrypTen: Secure Multi-Party Computation Meets Machine Learningcited by 131
  4. 2019EigenDamage: Structured Pruning in the Kronecker-Factored Eigenbasiscited by 98
  5. 2020Neural Mechanics: Symmetry and Broken Conservation Laws in Deep Learning Dynamicscited by 96
  6. 2021Top-KAST: Top-K Always Sparse Trainingcited by 79
  7. 2023DeepZero: Scaling up Zeroth-Order Optimization for Deep Model Trainingcited by 76
  8. 2023Towards Accurate Post-Training Quantization for Vision Transformercited by 71
  9. 2023X-Pruner: eXplainable Pruning for Vision Transformerscited by 68
  10. 2019CrypTFlow: Secure TensorFlow Inferencecited by 61
  11. 2022NoisyQuant: Noisy Bias-Enhanced Post-Training Activation Quantization for Vision Transformerscited by 61
  12. 2017SafetyNets: Verifiable Execution of Deep Neural Networks on an Untrusted Cloudcited by 50
  13. 2023ZipLM: Inference-Aware Structured Pruning of Language Modelscited by 49
  14. 2020Sparse Weight Activation Trainingcited by 45
  15. 2021Hessian-Aware Pruning and Optimal Neural Implantcited by 45
  16. 2024Tiny Machine Learning: Progress and Futurescited by 40
  17. 2023Dynamic Sparse Training with Structured Sparsitycited by 38
  18. 2021HEMET: A Homomorphic-Encryption-Friendly Privacy-Preserving Mobile Neural Network Architecturecited by 24
  19. 2022pvCNN: Privacy-Preserving and Verifiable Convolutional Neural Network Testingcited by 20
  20. 2022CAP: Correlation-Aware Pruning for Highly-Accurate Sparse Vision Modelscited by 20
  21. 2022MPCViT: Searching for Accurate and Efficient MPC-Friendly Vision Transformer with Heterogeneous Attentioncited by 20
  22. 2020The Representation Theory of Neural Networkscited by 19
  23. 2021Noether: The More Things Change, the More Stay the Samecited by 19
  24. 2020Auditing ML Models for Individual Bias and Unfairnesscited by 18
  25. 2024Verifiable evaluations of machine learning models using zkSNARKscited by 16
  26. 2015Symmetry-invariant optimization in deep networkscited by 15
  27. 2023Bi-directional Masks for Efficient N:M Sparse Trainingcited by 13
  28. 2023Investigating the Effect of Misalignment on Membership Privacy in the White-box Settingcited by 9
  29. 2024Secure and Confidential Certificates of Online Fairnesscited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 3.

9 papers.