mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

FairZK: A Scalable System to Prove Machine Learning Fairness in Zero-Knowledge

arXiv 2505.07997 ↗First posted 12 May 2025cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rise of machine learning techniques, ensuring the fairness of decisions made by machine learning algorithms has become of great importance in critical applications. However, measuring fairness often requires full access to the model parameters, which compromises the confidentiality of the models. In this paper, we propose a solution using zero-knowledge proofs, which allows the model owner to convince the public that a machine learning model is fair while preserving the secrecy of the model. To circumvent the efficiency barrier of naively proving machine learning inferences in zero-knowledge, our key innovation is a new approach to measure fairness only with model parameters and some aggregated information of the input, but not on any specific dataset. To achieve this goal, we derive new bounds for the fairness of logistic regression and deep neural network models that are tighter and better reflecting the fairness compared to prior work. Moreover, we develop efficient zero-knowledge proof protocols for common computations involved in measuring fairness, including the spectral norm of matrices, maximum, absolute value, and fixed-point arithmetic. We have fully implemented our system, FairZK, that proves machine learning fairness in zero-knowledge. Experimental results show that FairZK is significantly faster than the naive approach and an existing scheme that use zero-knowledge inferences as a subroutine. The prover time is improved by 3.1x--1789x depending on the size of the model and the dataset. FairZK can scale to a large model with 47 million parameters for the first time, and generates a proof for its fairness in 343 seconds. This is estimated to be 4 orders of magnitude faster than existing schemes, which only scale to small models with hundreds to thousands of parameters.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2025.

Builds on

19 of 63 references.

References · 19

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  4. 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
  5. 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 672
  6. 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
  7. 2017Data Decisions and Theoretical Implications when Adversarially Learning Fair Representationscited by 165
  8. 2018Aequitas: A Bias and Fairness Audit Toolkitcited by 147
  9. 2022Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trendscited by 62
  10. 2024zkLLM: Zero Knowledge Proofs for Large Language Modelscited by 51
  11. 2021NeuronFair: Interpretable White-Box Fairness Testing through Biased Neuron Identificationcited by 42
  12. 2022Fair Node Representation Learning via Adaptive Data Augmentationcited by 27
7 more
  1. 2022pvCNN: Privacy-Preserving and Verifiable Convolutional Neural Network Testingcited by 20
  2. 2023zkDL: Efficient Zero-Knowledge Proofs of Deep Learning Trainingcited by 20
  3. 2013Time-Optimal Interactive Proofs for Circuit Evaluationcited by 14
  4. 2024FairProof : Confidential and Certifiable Fairness for Neural Networkscited by 13
  5. 2023FairGAT: Fairness-aware Graph Attention Networkscited by 12
  6. 2024Secure and Confidential Certificates of Online Fairnesscited by 7
  7. 2017A Zero Knowledge Sumcheck and its Applicationscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 5.

5 papers.