mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Best Practices for Responsible Machine Learning in Credit Scoring

arXiv 2409.20536 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The widespread use of machine learning in credit scoring has brought significant advancements in risk assessment and decision-making. However, it has also raised concerns about potential biases, discrimination, and lack of transparency in these automated systems. This tutorial paper performed a non-systematic literature review to guide best practices for developing responsible machine learning models in credit scoring, focusing on fairness, reject inference, and explainability. We discuss definitions, metrics, and techniques for mitigating biases and ensuring equitable outcomes across different groups. Additionally, we address the issue of limited data representativeness by exploring reject inference methods that incorporate information from rejected loan applications. Finally, we emphasize the importance of transparency and explainability in credit models, discussing techniques that provide insights into the decision-making process and enable individuals to understand and potentially improve their creditworthiness. By adopting these best practices, financial institutions can harness the power of machine learning while upholding ethical and responsible lending practices.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 144 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2024.

Builds on

43 of 144 references.

References · 43

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  4. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  5. 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
  6. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  7. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  8. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  9. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
  10. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  11. 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,086
  12. 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
31 more
  1. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  2. 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
  3. 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 368
  4. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 364
  5. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  6. 2019Interpretable machine learning: definitions, methods, and applicationscited by 303
  7. 2016Visualizing the Effects of Predictor Variables in Black Box Supervised Learning Modelscited by 212
  8. 2018Delayed Impact of Fair Machine Learningcited by 183
  9. 2020Counterfactual Explanations and Algorithmic Recourses for Machine Learning: A Reviewcited by 174
  10. 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
  11. 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
  12. 2020Why Fairness Cannot Be Automated: Bridging the Gap Between EU Non-Discrimination Law and AIcited by 81
  13. 2021Fairness in Credit Scoring: Assessment, Implementation and Profit Implicationscited by 65
  14. 2019AdaFair: Cumulative Fairness Adaptive Boostingcited by 45
  15. 2020Accuracy and Fairness Trade-offs in Machine Learning: A Stochastic Multi-Objective Approachcited by 39
  16. 2022Representation Bias in Data: A Survey on Identification and Resolution Techniquescited by 37
  17. 2020Transparency, Auditability and eXplainability of Machine Learning Models in Credit Scoringcited by 26
  18. 2022FairGBM: Gradient Boosting with Fairness Constraintscited by 25
  19. 2020Addressing Fairness in Classification with a Model-Agnostic Multi-Objective Algorithmcited by 23
  20. 2019Fair Adversarial Gradient Tree Boostingcited by 17
  21. 2021Individually Fair Gradient Boostingcited by 12
  22. 2021Mitigating Bias in Algorithmic Systems -- A Fish-Eye Viewcited by 10
  23. 2019Deep Generative Models for Reject Inference in Credit Scoringcited by 9
  24. 2020FairXGBoost: Fairness-aware Classification in XGBoostcited by 9
  25. 2021Gradual (In)Compatibility of Fairness Criteriacited by 8
  26. 2022Mitigating Unfairness via Evolutionary Multi-objective Ensemble Learningcited by 8
  27. 2019Shallow Self-Learning for Reject Inference in Credit Scoringcited by 5
  28. 2022RMT-Net: Reject-aware Multi-Task Network for Modeling Missing-not-at-random Data in Financial Credit Scoringcited by 5
  29. 2024MOUNTAINEER: Topology-Driven Visual Analytics for Comparing Local Explanationscited by 4
  30. 2022Towards a Better Microcredit Decisioncited by 2
  31. 2023Designing Equitable Algorithmscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.