mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MOUNTAINEER: Topology-Driven Visual Analytics for Comparing Local Explanations

arXiv 2406.15613 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.GR math.ATcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the increasing use of black-box Machine Learning (ML) techniques in critical applications, there is a growing demand for methods that can provide transparency and accountability for model predictions. As a result, a large number of local explainability methods for black-box models have been developed and popularized. However, machine learning explanations are still hard to evaluate and compare due to the high dimensionality, heterogeneous representations, varying scales, and stochastic nature of some of these methods. Topological Data Analysis (TDA) can be an effective method in this domain since it can be used to transform attributions into uniform graph representations, providing a common ground for comparison across different explanation methods. We present a novel topology-driven visual analytics tool, Mountaineer, that allows ML practitioners to interactively analyze and compare these representations by linking the topological graphs back to the original data distribution, model predictions, and feature attributions. Mountaineer facilitates rapid and iterative exploration of ML explanations, enabling experts to gain deeper insights into the explanation techniques, understand the underlying data distributions, and thus reach well-founded conclusions about model behavior. Furthermore, we demonstrate the utility of Mountaineer through two case studies using real-world data. In the first, we show how Mountaineer enabled us to compare black-box ML explanations and discern regions of and causes of disagreements between different explanations. In the second, we demonstrate how the tool can be used to compare and understand ML models themselves. Finally, we conducted interviews with three industry experts to help us evaluate our work.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2024.

Builds on

20 of 53 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  3. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,384
  4. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  5. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  6. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,458
  7. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 547
  8. 2021Retiring Adult: New Datasets for Fair Machine Learningcited by 449
  9. 2017An introduction to Topological Data Analysis: fundamental and practical aspects for data scientistscited by 172
  10. 2022The Disagreement Problem in Explainable Machine Learning: A Practitioner's Perspectivecited by 159
  11. 2015A roadmap for the computation of persistent homologycited by 127
  12. 2022Which Explanation Should I Choose? A Function Approximation Perspective to Characterizing Post Hoc Explanationscited by 77
8 more
  1. 2018RuleMatrix: Visualizing and Understanding Classifiers with Rulescited by 62
  2. 2020giotto-tda: A Topological Data Analysis Toolkit for Machine Learning and Data Explorationcited by 55
  3. 2017Statistical Analysis and Parameter Selection for Mappercited by 20
  4. 2021Activation Landscapes as a Topological Summary of Neural Network Performancecited by 18
  5. 2020Localized Topological Simplification of Scalar Datacited by 9
  6. 2021AffectiveTDA: Using Topological Data Analysis to Improve Analysis and Explainability in Affective Computingcited by 3
  7. 2022Topological Representations of Local Explanationscited by 2
  8. 2021Pheno-Mapper: An Interactive Toolbox for the Visual Exploration of Phenomics Datacited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

4 papers.