mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

FairXGBoost: Fairness-aware Classification in XGBoost

arXiv 2009.01442 ↗First posted 3 Sep 2020cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Highly regulated domains such as finance have long favoured the use of machine learning algorithms that are scalable, transparent, robust and yield better performance. One of the most prominent examples of such an algorithm is XGBoost. Meanwhile, there is also a growing interest in building fair and unbiased models in these regulated domains and numerous bias-mitigation algorithms have been proposed to this end. However, most of these bias-mitigation methods are restricted to specific model families such as logistic regression or support vector machine models, thus leaving modelers with a difficult decision of choosing between fairness from the bias-mitigation algorithms and scalability, transparency, performance from algorithms such as XGBoost. We aim to leverage the best of both worlds by proposing a fair variant of XGBoost that enjoys all the advantages of XGBoost, while also matching the levels of fairness from the state-of-the-art bias-mitigation algorithms. Furthermore, the proposed solution requires very little in terms of changes to the original XGBoost library, thus making it easy for adoption. We provide an empirical analysis of our proposed method on standard benchmark datasets used in the fairness community.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 3 Sep 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 2; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

9 papers.