mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RMT-Net: Reject-aware Multi-Task Network for Modeling Missing-not-at-random Data in Financial Credit Scoring

arXiv 2206.00568 ↗First posted 1 Jun 2022cs.LG q-fin.STcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In financial credit scoring, loan applications may be approved or rejected. We can only observe default/non-default labels for approved samples but have no observations for rejected samples, which leads to missing-not-at-random selection bias. Machine learning models trained on such biased data are inevitably unreliable. In this work, we find that the default/non-default classification task and the rejection/approval classification task are highly correlated, according to both real-world data study and theoretical analysis. Consequently, the learning of default/non-default can benefit from rejection/approval. Accordingly, we for the first time propose to model the biased credit scoring data with Multi-Task Learning (MTL). Specifically, we propose a novel Reject-aware Multi-Task Network (RMT-Net), which learns the task weights that control the information sharing from the rejection/approval task to the default/non-default task by a gating network based on rejection probabilities. RMT-Net leverages the relation between the two tasks that the larger the rejection probability, the more the default/non-default task needs to learn from the rejection/approval task. Furthermore, we extend RMT-Net to RMT-Net++ for modeling scenarios with multiple rejection/approval strategies. Extensive experiments are conducted on several datasets, and strongly verifies the effectiveness of RMT-Net on both approved and rejected samples. In addition, RMT-Net++ further improves RMT-Net's performances.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jun 2022.

Builds on

25 of 79 references.

References · 25

  1. 2018End-to-End Multi-Task Learning with Attentioncited by 533
  2. 2014Semi-Supervised Learning with Deep Generative Modelscited by 494
  3. 2016Cross-stitch Networks for Multi-task Learningcited by 466
  4. 2015Doubly Robust Off-policy Value Evaluation for Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
  5. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
  6. 2021Deep Stable Learning for Out-Of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 153
  7. 2017Causal Embeddings for Recommendationcited by 79
  8. 2019Stable Learning via Sample Reweightingcited by 70
  9. 2021AutoDebias: Learning to Debias for Recommendationcited by 68
  10. 2020Stable Prediction with Model Misspecification and Agnostic Distribution Shiftcited by 62
  11. 2018Stable Prediction across Unknown Environmentscited by 55
  12. 2021Modeling the Sequential Dependence among Audience Multi-step Conversions with Multi-task Learning in Targeted Display Advertisingcited by 39
13 more
  1. 2020Information Theoretic Counterfactual Learning from Missing-Not-At-Random Feedbackcited by 30
  2. 2017Estimation of causal effects with multiple treatments: a review and new ideascited by 29
  3. 2017Latent Multi-task Architecture Learningcited by 29
  4. 2019Asymmetric Tri-training for Debiasing Missing-Not-At-Random Explicit Feedbackcited by 28
  5. 2021Enhanced Doubly Robust Learning for Debiasing Post-click Conversion Rate Estimationcited by 28
  6. 2019E.T.-RNN: Applying Deep Learning to Credit Loan Applicationscited by 26
  7. 2020Unbiased Learning for the Causal Effect of Recommendationcited by 18
  8. 2020The Importance of Modeling Data Missingness in Algorithmic Fairness: A Causal Perspectivecited by 17
  9. 2020Adversarial Counterfactual Learning and Evaluation for Recommender Systemcited by 16
  10. 2016Multi-behavioral Sequential Prediction with Recurrent Log-bilinear Modelcited by 9
  11. 2019Deep Generative Models for Reject Inference in Credit Scoringcited by 9
  12. 2020An Empirical Study on Feature Discretizationcited by 6
  13. 2018Simultaneous Modeling of Multiple Complications for Risk Profiling in Diabetes Carecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

5 papers.