mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Characterizing Model Robustness via Natural Input Gradients

arXiv 2409.20139 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2024cs.LG cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarially robust models are locally smooth around each data sample so that small perturbations cannot drastically change model outputs. In modern systems, such smoothness is usually obtained via Adversarial Training, which explicitly enforces models to perform well on perturbed examples. In this work, we show the surprising effectiveness of instead regularizing the gradient with respect to model inputs on natural examples only. Penalizing input Gradient Norm is commonly believed to be a much inferior approach. Our analyses identify that the performance of Gradient Norm regularization critically depends on the smoothness of activation functions, and are in fact extremely effective on modern vision transformers that adopt smooth activations over piecewise linear ones (eg, ReLU), contrary to prior belief. On ImageNet-1k, Gradient Norm training achieves > 90% the performance of state-of-the-art PGD-3 Adversarial Training} (52% vs.~56%), while using only 60% computation cost of the state-of-the-art without complex adversarial optimization. Our analyses also highlight the relationship between model robustness and properties of natural input gradients, such as asymmetric sample and channel statistics. Surprisingly, we find model robustness can be significantly improved by simply regularizing its gradients to concentrate on image edges without explicit conditioning on the gradient norm.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2024.

Builds on

50 of 62 references.

References · 50

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  8. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  9. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  10. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
  11. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  12. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
38 more
  1. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  2. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  3. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  4. 2018Averaging Weights Leads to Wider Optima and Better Generalizationcited by 1,194
  5. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  6. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  7. 2018AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Datacited by 728
  8. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
  9. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  10. 2018Improving Transferability of Adversarial Examples with Input Diversitycited by 591
  11. 2017Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytopecited by 564
  12. 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
  13. 2019On Evaluating Adversarial Robustnesscited by 442
  14. 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 382
  15. 2017Defense against Adversarial Attacks Using High-Level Representation Guided Denoisercited by 329
  16. 2020Do Adversarially Robust ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 315
  17. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
  18. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  19. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
  20. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
  21. 2018Robustness via curvature regularization, and vice versacited by 174
  22. 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
  23. 2020Smooth Adversarial Trainingcited by 89
  24. 2018Improving DNN Robustness to Adversarial Attacks using Jacobian Regularizationcited by 88
  25. 2023A Comprehensive Study on Robustness of Image Classification Models: Benchmarking and Rethinkingcited by 85
  26. 2020Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial Trainingcited by 75
  27. 2019Scaleable input gradient regularization for adversarial robustnesscited by 45
  28. 2015A Unified Gradient Regularization Family for Adversarial Examplescited by 43
  29. 2019Are Perceptually-Aligned Gradients a General Property of Robust Classifiers?cited by 42
  30. 2021Low Curvature Activations Reduce Overfitting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 29
  31. 2019Adversarial Defense by Suppressing High-frequency Componentscited by 22
  32. 2023Which Models have Perceptually-Aligned Gradients? An Explanation via Off-Manifold Robustnesscited by 20
  33. 2022Efficiently Training Low-Curvature Neural Networkscited by 19
  34. 2024Efficient local linearity regularization to overcome catastrophic overfittingcited by 7
  35. 2020Second Order Optimization for Adversarial Robustness and Interpretabilitycited by 6
  36. 2019L 1-norm double backpropagation adversarial defensecited by 3
  37. 2022Jacobian Norm with Selective Input Gradient Regularization for Improved and Interpretable Adversarial Defensecited by 2
  38. 2022Bag of Tricks for FGSM Adversarial Trainingcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

6 papers.