Efficient local linearity regularization to overcome catastrophic overfitting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Catastrophic overfitting (CO) in single-step adversarial training (AT) results in abrupt drops in the adversarial test accuracy (even down to 0%). For models trained with multi-step AT, it has been observed that the loss function behaves locally linearly with respect to the input, this is however lost in single-step AT. To address CO in single-step AT, several methods have been proposed to enforce local linearity of the loss via regularization. However, these regularization terms considerably slow down training due to Double Backpropagation. Instead, in this work, we introduce a regularization term, called ELLE, to mitigate CO effectively and efficiently in classical AT evaluations, as well as some more difficult regimes, e.g., large adversarial perturbations and long training schedules. Our regularization term can be theoretically linked to curvature of the loss function and is computationally cheaper than previous methods by avoiding Double Backpropagation. Our thorough experimental validation demonstrates that our work does not suffer from CO, even in challenging settings where previous works suffer from it. We also notice that adapting our regularization parameter during training (ELLE-A) greatly improves the performance, specially in large ε setups. Our implementation is available in https://github.com/LIONS-EPFL/ELLE .
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2024.
Builds on
33 of 47 references.
References · 33
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
- 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
- 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
- 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
- 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
- 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 333
- 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 241
21 more
- 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
- 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
- 2022General Cutting Planes for Bound-Propagation-Based Neural Network Verificationcited by 102
- 2020Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial Trainingcited by 75
- 2021Revisiting and Advancing Fast Adversarial Training Through The Lens of Bi-Level Optimizationcited by 75
- 2020Adversarial Vertex Mixup: Toward Better Adversarially Robust Generalizationcited by 73
- 2020Guided Adversarial Attack for Evaluating and Enhancing Adversarial Defensescited by 61
- 2022Make Some Noise: Reliable and Efficient Single-Step Adversarial Trainingcited by 42
- 2021Subspace Adversarial Trainingcited by 41
- 2023Exploring and Exploiting Decision Boundary Dynamics for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 35
- 2020Towards Understanding Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 32
- 2021Low Curvature Activations Reduce Overfitting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 29
- 2021Reliably fast adversarial training via latent adversarial perturbationcited by 29
- 2022Understanding and Combating Robust Overfitting via Input Loss Landscape Analysis and Regularizationcited by 22
- 2022Scaling Adversarial Training to Large Perturbation Boundscited by 20
- 2022Efficiently Training Low-Curvature Neural Networkscited by 19
- 2020Understanding and Increasing Efficiency of Frank-Wolfe Adversarial Trainingcited by 14
- 2019A Closer Look at Double Backpropagationcited by 7
- 2023Investigating Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Training: A Self-fitting Perspectivecited by 5
- 2022Catastrophic overfitting can be induced with discriminative non-robust featurescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024Preventing Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Training: A Bi-level Optimization Perspectivecited by 12
- 2024Layer-Aware Analysis of Catastrophic Overfitting: Revealing the Pseudo-Robust Shortcut Dependencycited by 9
- 2024Characterizing Model Robustness via Natural Input Gradientscited by 6
- 2024Adversarial Training: A Surveycited by 6
- 2024On Using Certified Training towards Empirical Robustnesscited by 3
- 2026Quadratic Upper Bound for Boosting Robustnesscited by 0
- 2026FastAT Benchmark: A Comprehensive Framework for Fair Evaluation of Fast Adversarial Training Methodscited by 0
- 2026FastAT Benchmark: A Comprehensive Framework for Fair Evaluation of Fast Adversarial Training Methods22 Apr 2026
- 2026Quadratic Upper Bound for Boosting Robustness20 Jan 2026
- 2024Adversarial Training: A Survey19 Oct 2024
- 2024On Using Certified Training towards Empirical Robustness2 Oct 2024
- 2024Characterizing Model Robustness via Natural Input Gradients30 Sep 2024
- 2024Preventing Catastrophic Overfitting in Fast Adversarial Training: A Bi-level Optimization Perspective17 Jul 2024
- 2024Layer-Aware Analysis of Catastrophic Overfitting: Revealing the Pseudo-Robust Shortcut Dependency25 May 2024