mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Jacobian Norm with Selective Input Gradient Regularization for Improved and Interpretable Adversarial Defense

arXiv 2207.13036 ↗First posted 9 Jul 2022cs.LG cs.AI cs.CRcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples that are crafted with imperceptible perturbations, i.e., a small change in an input image can induce a mis-classification, and thus threatens the reliability of deep learning based deployment systems. Adversarial training (AT) is often adopted to improve robustness through training a mixture of corrupted and clean data. However, most of AT based methods are ineffective in dealing with transferred adversarial examples which are generated to fool a wide spectrum of defense models, and thus cannot satisfy the generalization requirement raised in real-world scenarios. Moreover, adversarially training a defense model in general cannot produce interpretable predictions towards the inputs with perturbations, whilst a highly interpretable robust model is required by different domain experts to understand the behaviour of a DNN. In this work, we propose a novel approach based on Jacobian norm and Selective Input Gradient Regularization (J-SIGR), which suggests the linearized robustness through Jacobian normalization and also regularizes the perturbation-based saliency maps to imitate the model's interpretable predictions. As such, we achieve both the improved defense and high interpretability of DNNs. Finally, we evaluate our method across different architectures against powerful adversarial attacks. Experiments demonstrate that the proposed J-SIGR confers improved robustness against transferred adversarial attacks, and we also show that the predictions from the neural network are easy to interpret.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 38 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2022.

Builds on

38 of 48 references.

References · 38

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  4. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
  5. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  6. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  7. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  8. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  9. 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 950
  10. 2016Practical Black-Box Attacks against Machine Learningcited by 893
  11. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  12. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
26 more
  1. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  2. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  3. 2017ZOO: Zeroth Order Optimization based Black-box Attacks to Deep Neural Networks without Training Substitute Modelscited by 656
  4. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  5. 2016Delving into Transferable Adversarial Examples and Black-box Attackscited by 530
  6. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  7. 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 462
  8. 2017Improving the Adversarial Robustness and Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks by Regularizing their Input Gradientscited by 236
  9. 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
  10. 2017Towards Robust Neural Networks via Random Self-ensemblecited by 158
  11. 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 156
  12. 2019Adversarial Robustness through Local Linearizationcited by 146
  13. 2019Robust Learning with Jacobian Regularizationcited by 127
  14. 2018Parametric Noise Injection: Trainable Randomness to Improve Deep Neural Network Robustness against Adversarial Attackcited by 123
  15. 2019Defense Against Adversarial Attacks Using Feature Scattering-based Adversarial Trainingcited by 95
  16. 2019On the Connection Between Adversarial Robustness and Saliency Map Interpretabilitycited by 80
  17. 2018Adv-BNN: Improved Adversarial Defense through Robust Bayesian Neural Networkcited by 68
  18. 2019Jacobian Adversarially Regularized Networks for Robustnesscited by 40
  19. 2016Gradients of Counterfactualscited by 31
  20. 2017Biologically inspired protection of deep networks from adversarial attackscited by 23
  21. 2021Attack to Fool and Explain Deep Networkscited by 17
  22. 2019Robust Design of Deep Neural Networks against Adversarial Attacks based on Lyapunov Theorycited by 13
  23. 2020Are Gradient-based Saliency Maps Useful in Deep Reinforcement Learning?cited by 9
  24. 2020Orthogonal Deep Models As Defense Against Black-Box Attackscited by 7
  25. 2018A Kernel Perspective for Regularizing Deep Neural Networkscited by 4
  26. 2022Policy Distillation with Selective Input Gradient Regularization for Efficient Interpretabilitycited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1.

2 papers.