mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Bag of Tricks for FGSM Adversarial Training

arXiv 2209.02684 ↗First posted 6 Sep 2022cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial training (AT) with samples generated by Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM), also known as FGSM-AT, is a computationally simple method to train robust networks. However, during its training procedure, an unstable mode of "catastrophic overfitting" has been identified in arXiv:2001.03994 [cs.LG], where the robust accuracy abruptly drops to zero within a single training step. Existing methods use gradient regularizers or random initialization tricks to attenuate this issue, whereas they either take high computational cost or lead to lower robust accuracy. In this work, we provide the first study, which thoroughly examines a collection of tricks from three perspectives: Data Initialization, Network Structure, and Optimization, to overcome the catastrophic overfitting in FGSM-AT. Surprisingly, we find that simple tricks, i.e., a) masking partial pixels (even without randomness), b) setting a large convolution stride and smooth activation functions, or c) regularizing the weights of the first convolutional layer, can effectively tackle the overfitting issue. Extensive results on a range of network architectures validate the effectiveness of each proposed trick, and the combinations of tricks are also investigated. For example, trained with PreActResNet-18 on CIFAR-10, our method attains 49.8% accuracy against PGD-50 attacker and 46.4% accuracy against AutoAttack, demonstrating that pure FGSM-AT is capable of enabling robust learners. The code and models are publicly available at https://github.com/UCSC-VLAA/Bag-of-Tricks-for-FGSM-AT.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2022.

Builds on

36 of 39 references.

References · 36

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  3. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  4. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  5. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  6. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,960
  7. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,510
  8. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  9. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
  10. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  11. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  12. 2020Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial trainingcited by 723
24 more
  1. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
  2. 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 638
  3. 2020Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningcited by 504
  4. 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 333
  5. 2018Feature Denoising for Improving Adversarial Robustnesscited by 312
  6. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 275
  7. 2021Escaping the Big Data Paradigm with Compact Transformerscited by 261
  8. 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
  9. 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
  10. 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
  11. 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 208
  12. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
  13. 2021Data Augmentation Can Improve Robustnesscited by 193
  14. 2021Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?cited by 187
  15. 2021Robust Learning Meets Generative Models: Can Proxy Distributions Improve Adversarial Robustness?cited by 113
  16. 2021On the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Transformerscited by 104
  17. 2020Smooth Adversarial Trainingcited by 89
  18. 2019When NAS Meets Robustness: In Search of Robust Architectures against Adversarial Attackscited by 87
  19. 2020Do Wider Neural Networks Really Help Adversarial Robustness?cited by 79
  20. 2021RobustART: Benchmarking Robustness on Architecture Design and Training Techniquescited by 78
  21. 2020Understanding Catastrophic Overfitting in Single-step Adversarial Trainingcited by 75
  22. 2020Efficient Robust Training via Backward Smoothingcited by 29
  23. 2021Low Curvature Activations Reduce Overfitting in Adversarial Trainingcited by 29
  24. 2021Stereoscopic Universal Perturbations across Different Architectures and Datasetscited by 17

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2.

2 papers.