Orthogonal Finetuning for Direct Preference Optimization
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
DPO is an effective preference optimization algorithm. However, the DPO-tuned models tend to overfit on the dispreferred samples, manifested as overly long generations lacking diversity. While recent regularization approaches have endeavored to alleviate this issue by modifying the objective function, they achieved that at the cost of alignment performance degradation. In this paper, we innovatively incorporate regularization from the perspective of weight updating to curb alignment overfitting. Through the pilot experiment, we discovered that there exists a positive correlation between overfitting and the hyperspherical energy fluctuation. Hence, we introduce orthogonal finetuning for DPO via a weight-Rotated Preference Optimization (RoPO) method, which merely conducts rotational and magnitude-stretching updates on the weight parameters to maintain the hyperspherical energy invariant, thereby preserving the knowledge encoded in the angle between neurons. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our model aligns perfectly with human preferences while retaining the original expressive capacity using only 0.0086% of the trainable parameters, suggesting an effective regularization against overfitting. Specifically, RoPO outperforms DPO by up to 10 points on MT-Bench and by up to 2.8 points on AlpacaEval 2, while enhancing the generation diversity by an average of 6 points.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 29 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2024.
Builds on
29 of 41 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
- 2024Contrastive Preference Optimization: Pushing the Boundaries of LLM Performance in Machine Translation16 Jan
- 2023A General Theoretical Paradigm to Understand Learning from Human Preferences18 Oct
- 2023Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints28 Sep
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 24
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
- 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,195
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,769
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,068
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
12 more
- 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 740
- 2023RAFT: Reward rAnked FineTuning for Generative Foundation Model Alignmentcited by 672
- 2023RRHF: Rank Responses to Align Language Models with Human Feedback without tearscited by 454
- 2023SLiC-HF: Sequence Likelihood Calibration with Human Feedbackcited by 395
- 2023Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraintcited by 346
- 2023Controlling Text-to-Image Diffusion by Orthogonal Finetuningcited by 207
- 2023Parameter-Efficient Orthogonal Finetuning via Butterfly Factorizationcited by 112
- 2018Learning towards Minimum Hyperspherical Energycited by 75
- 2020Orthogonal Over-Parameterized Trainingcited by 44
- 2024Parameter Efficient Quasi-Orthogonal Fine-Tuning via Givens Rotationcited by 21
- 2022Empathetic Dialogue Generation via Sensitive Emotion Recognition and Sensible Knowledge Selectioncited by 19
- 2024Light-PEFT: Lightening Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning via Early Pruningcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5.
5 papers.
- 2025Orthogonal Finetuning Made Scalablecited by 7
- 2025Diffusion-SDPO: Safeguarded Direct Preference Optimization for Diffusion Modelscited by 6
- 2025Breaking the Trade-Off Between Faithfulness and Expressiveness for Large Language Modelscited by 2
- 2025Sem-DPO: Mitigating Semantic Inconsistency in Preference Optimization for Prompt Engineeringcited by 0
- 2025Preference Robustness for DPO with Applications to Public Healthcited by 0
- 2025Diffusion-SDPO: Safeguarded Direct Preference Optimization for Diffusion Models5 Nov 2025
- 2025Preference Robustness for DPO with Applications to Public Health2 Sep 2025
- 2025Breaking the Trade-Off Between Faithfulness and Expressiveness for Large Language Models26 Aug 2025
- 2025Sem-DPO: Mitigating Semantic Inconsistency in Preference Optimization for Prompt Engineering27 Jul 2025
- 2025Orthogonal Finetuning Made Scalable24 Jun 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024SEE-DPO: Self Entropy Enhanced Direct Preference Optimization
- 2024Direct Preference Optimization with an Offset
- 2025FocalPO: Enhancing Preference Optimizing by Focusing on Correct Preference Rankings
- 2024Minor DPO reject penalty to increase training robustness
- 2026Normalized Rewards for Preference Optimization
- 2025Why DPO is a Misspecified Estimator and How to Fix It
- 2024As Simple as Fine-tuning: LLM Alignment via Bidirectional Negative Feedback Loss
- 2026PLC-DPO: Posterior Label Correction in Noisy and Ambiguous Preference Optimization