Trimming the Risk: Towards Reliable Continuous Training for Deep Learning Inspection Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The industry increasingly relies on deep learning (DL) technology for manufacturing inspections, which are challenging to automate with rule-based machine vision algorithms. DL-powered inspection systems derive defect patterns from labeled images, combining human-like agility with the consistency of a computerized system. However, finite labeled datasets often fail to encompass all natural variations necessitating Continuous Training (CT) to regularly adjust their models with recent data. Effective CT requires fresh labeled samples from the original distribution; otherwise, selfgenerated labels can lead to silent performance degradation. To mitigate this risk, we develop a robust CT-based maintenance approach that updates DL models using reliable data selections through a two-stage filtering process. The initial stage filters out low-confidence predictions, as the model inherently discredits them. The second stage uses variational auto-encoders and histograms to generate image embeddings that capture latent and pixel characteristics, then rejects the inputs of substantially shifted embeddings as drifted data with erroneous overconfidence. Then, a fine-tuning of the original DL model is executed on the filtered inputs while validating on a mixture of recent production and original datasets. This strategy mitigates catastrophic forgetting and ensures the model adapts effectively to new operational conditions. Evaluations on industrial inspection systems for popsicle stick prints and glass bottles using critical real-world datasets showed less than 9% of erroneous self-labeled data are retained after filtering and used for fine-tuning, improving model performance on production data by up to 14% without compromising its results on original validation data.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 78 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Sep 2024.
Builds on
36 of 78 references.
References · 36
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,313
- 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
- 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 547
- 2018Threat of Adversarial Attacks on Deep Learning in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 459
- 2017Training Confidence-calibrated Classifiers for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samplescited by 389
- 2017Snorkel: Rapid Training Data Creation with Weak Supervisioncited by 370
- 2020Calibration of Pre-trained Transformerscited by 307
- 2022Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalizationcited by 251
- 2018Failing Loudly: An Empirical Study of Methods for Detecting Dataset Shiftcited by 240
- 2019Don't Blame the ELBO! A Linear VAE Perspective on Posterior Collapsecited by 120
24 more
- 2021Predicting with Confidence on Unseen Distributionscited by 116
- 2020Tilted Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 103
- 2022From Concept Drift to Model Degradation: An Overview on Performance-Aware Drift Detectorscited by 82
- 2021Classifier Calibration: A survey on how to assess and improve predicted class probabilitiescited by 71
- 2013One-Class Classification: Taxonomy of Study and Review of Techniquescited by 68
- 2022A Survey on Programmatic Weak Supervisioncited by 66
- 2021Understanding Softmax Confidence and Uncertaintycited by 62
- 2022Debiased Self-Training for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 62
- 2020Post-hoc Uncertainty Calibration for Domain Drift Scenarioscited by 61
- 2018Snorkel DryBell: A Case Study in Deploying Weak Supervision at Industrial Scalecited by 52
- 2019Out-of-distribution Detection in Classifiers via Generationcited by 49
- 2020Affinity and Diversity: Quantifying Mechanisms of Data Augmentationcited by 45
- 2022A Learning Based Hypothesis Test for Harmful Covariate Shiftcited by 18
- 2019DeepEvolution: A Search-Based Testing Approach for Deep Neural Networkscited by 15
- 2021Automatically detecting data drift in machine learning classifierscited by 15
- 2022Towards out of distribution generalization for problems in mechanicscited by 11
- 2024Diffuse to Choose: Enriching Image Conditioned Inpainting in Latent Diffusion Models for Virtual Try-Allcited by 11
- 2022CheXstray: Real-time Multi-Modal Data Concordance for Drift Detection in Medical Imaging AIcited by 7
- 2021A Survey on Machine Learning Techniques for Auto Labeling of Video, Audio, and Text Datacited by 6
- 2023Explaining Model Confidence Using Counterfactualscited by 4
- 2023Streaming LifeLong Learning With Any-Time Inferencecited by 3
- 2023A Confidence-based Partial Label Learning Model for Crowd-Annotated Named Entity Recognitioncited by 3
- 2023Efficient Uncertainty Estimation with Gaussian Process for Reliable Dialog Response Retrievalcited by 2
- 2022TrustGAN: Training safe and trustworthy deep learning models through generative adversarial networkscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.