mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Towards out of distribution generalization for problems in mechanics

arXiv 2206.14917 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2022stat.ML cs.CE cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There has been a massive increase in research interest towards applying data driven methods to problems in mechanics. While traditional machine learning (ML) methods have enabled many breakthroughs, they rely on the assumption that the training (observed) data and testing (unseen) data are independent and identically distributed (i.i.d). Thus, traditional ML approaches often break down when applied to real world mechanics problems with unknown test environments and data distribution shifts. In contrast, out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization assumes that the test data may shift (i.e., violate the i.i.d. assumption). To date, multiple methods have been proposed to improve the OOD generalization of ML methods. However, because of the lack of benchmark datasets for OOD regression problems, the efficiency of these OOD methods on regression problems, which dominate the mechanics field, remains unknown. To address this, we investigate the performance of OOD generalization methods for regression problems in mechanics. Specifically, we identify three OOD problems: covariate shift, mechanism shift, and sampling bias. For each problem, we create two benchmark examples that extend the Mechanical MNIST dataset collection, and we investigate the performance of popular OOD generalization methods on these mechanics-specific regression problems. Our numerical experiments show that in most cases, while the OOD generalization algorithms perform better compared to traditional ML methods on these OOD problems, there is a compelling need to develop more robust OOD generalization methods that are effective across multiple OOD scenarios. Overall, we expect that this study, as well as the associated open access benchmark datasets, will enable further development of OOD generalization methods for mechanics specific regression problems.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 56 of its 119 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2022.

Builds on

56 of 119 references.

References · 56

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
  3. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  4. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  5. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  6. 2019Distributionally Robust Neural Networks for Group Shifts: On the Importance of Regularization for Worst-Case Generalizationcited by 1,232
  7. 2020In Search of Lost Domain Generalizationcited by 1,042
  8. 2017Deeper, Broader and Artier Domain Generalizationcited by 983
  9. 2021E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural Networkscited by 951
  10. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  11. 2021Generalized Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Surveycited by 796
  12. 2020Out-of-Distribution Generalization via Risk Extrapolation (REx)cited by 737
38 more
  1. 2018Recognition in Terra Incognitacited by 655
  2. 2018Deep Visual Domain Adaptation: A Surveycited by 634
  3. 2022Scientific Machine Learning through Physics-Informed Neural Networks: Where we are and What's nextcited by 603
  4. 2020SE(3)-Transformers: 3D Roto-Translation Equivariant Attention Networkscited by 602
  5. 2015Causal inference using invariant prediction: identification and confidence intervalscited by 533
  6. 2020Learning under Concept Drift: A Reviewcited by 470
  7. 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 431
  8. 2018Learning Models with Uniform Performance via Distributionally Robust Optimizationcited by 334
  9. 2020An Investigation of Why Overparameterization Exacerbates Spurious Correlationscited by 310
  10. 2020Environment Inference for Invariant Learningcited by 306
  11. 2020A Brief Review of Domain Adaptationcited by 287
  12. 2018Learning Confidence for Out-of-Distribution Detection in Neural Networkscited by 245
  13. 2019Causality for Machine Learningcited by 242
  14. 2020Domain Generalization using Causal Matchingcited by 224
  15. 2018A General Theory of Equivariant CNNs on Homogeneous Spacescited by 223
  16. 2018An Introduction to Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 201
  17. 2020Invariant Risk Minimization Gamescited by 188
  18. 2020Understanding the Failure Modes of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 146
  19. 2020Efficient Domain Generalization via Common-Specific Low-Rank Decompositioncited by 134
  20. 2020Invariant Rationalizationcited by 131
  21. 2018Invariance, Causality and Robustnesscited by 123
  22. 2021Towards a Theoretical Framework of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 94
  23. 2020Deep Visual Domain Adaptationcited by 91
  24. 2021Heterogeneous Risk Minimizationcited by 90
  25. 2021On the Impact of Spurious Correlation for Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 68
  26. 2020Stable Prediction with Model Misspecification and Agnostic Distribution Shiftcited by 62
  27. 2021Benchmarking the Performance of Bayesian Optimization across Multiple Experimental Materials Science Domainscited by 46
  28. 2021Confidence-based Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Comparative Study and Analysiscited by 34
  29. 2021Dangers of Bayesian Model Averaging under Covariate Shiftcited by 31
  30. 2020Finding Symmetry Breaking Order Parameters with Euclidean Neural Networkscited by 30
  31. 2020An Ensemble of Simple Convolutional Neural Network Models for MNIST Digit Recognitioncited by 30
  32. 2018Estimate and Replace: A Novel Approach to Integrating Deep Neural Networks with Existing Applicationscited by 21
  33. 2021Eighty Years of the Finite Element Method: Birth, Evolution, and Futurecited by 21
  34. 2021Kernelized Heterogeneous Risk Minimizationcited by 21
  35. 2018Meta-modeling game for deriving theoretical-consistent, micro-structural-based traction-separation laws via deep reinforcement learningcited by 19
  36. 2019Machine learning materials physics: Multi-resolution neural networks learn the free energy and nonlinear elastic response of evolving microstructurescited by 17
  37. 2021Bayesian OOD detection with aleatoric uncertainty and outlier exposurecited by 16
  38. 2021Are Bayesian neural networks intrinsically good at out-of-distribution detection?cited by 10

50 most cited of 56 All 56 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

11 papers.