mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Federated Q-Learning: Linear Regret Speedup with Low Communication Cost

arXiv 2312.15023 ↗First posted 22 Dec 2023cs.LG stat.MLcited by 19

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we consider federated reinforcement learning for tabular episodic Markov Decision Processes (MDP) where, under the coordination of a central server, multiple agents collaboratively explore the environment and learn an optimal policy without sharing their raw data. While linear speedup in the number of agents has been achieved for some metrics, such as convergence rate and sample complexity, in similar settings, it is unclear whether it is possible to design a model-free algorithm to achieve linear regret speedup with low communication cost. We propose two federated Q-Learning algorithms termed as FedQ-Hoeffding and FedQ-Bernstein, respectively, and show that the corresponding total regrets achieve a linear speedup compared with their single-agent counterparts when the time horizon is sufficiently large, while the communication cost scales logarithmically in the total number of time steps T. Those results rely on an event-triggered synchronization mechanism between the agents and the server, a novel step size selection when the server aggregates the local estimates of the state-action values to form the global estimates, and a set of new concentration inequalities to bound the sum of non-martingale differences. This is the first work showing that linear regret speedup and logarithmic communication cost can be achieved by model-free algorithms in federated reinforcement learning.

Key facts. Cited by 19 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Dec 2023.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 9; 2025: 6; 2026: 4.

19 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Federated Offline Reinforcement Learning: Collaborative Single-Policy Coverage Sufficescited by 11
  2. 2024The Sample-Communication Complexity Trade-off in Federated Q-Learningcited by 8
  3. 2024Gap-Dependent Bounds for Q-Learning using Reference-Advantage Decompositioncited by 8
  4. 2024In-Trajectory Inverse Reinforcement Learning: Learn Incrementally Before An Ongoing Trajectory Terminatescited by 7
  5. 2024Compressed Federated Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Modelcited by 5
  6. 2024On the Linear Speedup of Personalized Federated Reinforcement Learning with Shared Representationscited by 4
  7. 2025Gap-Dependent Bounds for Federated Q-learningcited by 4
  8. 2024On the Convergence Rates of Federated Q-Learning across Heterogeneous Environmentscited by 2
  9. 2025Collaborative Value Function Estimation Under Model Mismatch: A Federated Temporal Difference Analysiscited by 2
  10. 2025Regret-Optimal Q-Learning with Low Cost for Single-Agent and Federated Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  11. 2025Convergence Guarantees for Federated SARSA with Local Training and Heterogeneous Agentscited by 2
  12. 2026FedMOA: Federated GRPO for Personalized Reasoning LLMs under Heterogeneous Rewardscited by 2
7 more
  1. 2024A finite time analysis of distributed Q-learningcited by 1
  2. 2024Understanding the Statistical Accuracy-Communication Trade-off in Personalized Federated Learning with Minimax Guaranteescited by 1
  3. 2025Q-Learning with Fine-Grained Gap-Dependent Regretcited by 1
  4. 2025Explainable reinforcement learning from human feedback to improve alignmentcited by 1
  5. 2026Refined Analysis of Entropy-Regularized Actor-Criticcited by 1
  6. 2026Sample Complexity of Average-Reward Q-Learning: From Single-agent to Federated Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  7. 2026Provably Efficient Federated Reinforcement Learning with Linear Function Approximation and Logarithmic Communication Costcited by 0