On the Convergence of Consensus Algorithms with Markovian Noise and Gradient Bias
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper presents a finite time convergence analysis for a decentralized stochastic approximation (SA) scheme. The scheme generalizes several algorithms for decentralized machine learning and multi-agent reinforcement learning. Our proof technique involves separating the iterates into their respective consensual parts and consensus error. The consensus error is bounded in terms of the stationarity of the consensual part, while the updates of the consensual part can be analyzed as a perturbed SA scheme. Under the Markovian noise and time varying communication graph assumptions, the decentralized SA scheme has an expected convergence rate of cal O(log T/ √T ), where T is the iteration number, in terms of squared norms of gradient for nonlinear SA with smooth but non-convex cost function. This rate is comparable to the best known performances of SA in a centralized setting with a non-convex potential function.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 18 Aug 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 0; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.
10 papers.
- 2023The Blessing of Heterogeneity in Federated Q-Learning: Linear Speedup and Beyondcited by 34
- 2024The Sample-Communication Complexity Trade-off in Federated Q-Learningcited by 8
- 2024Compressed Federated Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Modelcited by 5
- 2023A One-Sample Decentralized Proximal Algorithm for Non-Convex Stochastic Composite Optimizationcited by 4
- 2025Gap-Dependent Bounds for Federated Q-learningcited by 4
- 2024Does Worst-Performing Agent Lead the Pack? Analyzing Agent Dynamics in Unified Distributed SGDcited by 2
- 2025Collaborative Value Function Estimation Under Model Mismatch: A Federated Temporal Difference Analysiscited by 2
- 2025Regret-Optimal Q-Learning with Low Cost for Single-Agent and Federated Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
- 2021A Law of Iterated Logarithm for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2023Markov Chain Mirror Descent On Data Federationcited by 1
- 2025Regret-Optimal Q-Learning with Low Cost for Single-Agent and Federated Reinforcement Learning5 Jun 2025
- 2025Collaborative Value Function Estimation Under Model Mismatch: A Federated Temporal Difference Analysis21 Mar 2025
- 2025Gap-Dependent Bounds for Federated Q-learning5 Feb 2025
- 2024Does Worst-Performing Agent Lead the Pack? Analyzing Agent Dynamics in Unified Distributed SGD26 Sep 2024
- 2024The Sample-Communication Complexity Trade-off in Federated Q-Learning30 Aug 2024
- 2024Compressed Federated Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model26 Mar 2024
- 2023Markov Chain Mirror Descent On Data Federation26 Sep 2023
- 2023The Blessing of Heterogeneity in Federated Q-Learning: Linear Speedup and Beyond18 May 2023
- 2023A One-Sample Decentralized Proximal Algorithm for Non-Convex Stochastic Composite Optimization20 Feb 2023
- 2021A Law of Iterated Logarithm for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning27 Oct 2021