PromptPET: Privacy-Utility Optimized Prompt Obfuscation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Privacy is an important challenge when users interact with AI chatbots, since users may share sensitive information, explicitly or implicitly, and AI chatbots can use this information for user profiling. In this paper, we aim to protect user privacy via a user-side mechanism that transforms sensitive information in a user prompt, while preserving enough information to elicit a useful response from the chatbot. This approach faces an inherent tradeoff between protecting privacy (i.e., avoiding profiling) and preserving utility (i.e., getting personalized and task-specific responses). To that end, we consider, evaluate, and compare four different obfuscation actions, namely redaction, abstraction, replacement, and a novel noising/denoising scheme that we introduce. Additional novel insights include: utilizing a data type taxonomy to both identify and obfuscate sensitive information and explicitly taking into account the utility of chat responses in making the obfuscation decision. First, we systematically optimize and evaluate each obfuscation action independently in terms of the privacy-utility tradeoff it achieves. Second, we propose PROMPTPET, an LLM-based agent that selects the best obfuscation action for each sensitive part of the prompt, using a reinforcement-learning inspired rule optimizer, applied for the first time in this context. Using a real-world chat dataset, we show that PROMPTPET matches the best privacy-utility tradeoff attainable by any single obfuscation action and significantly outperforms prior state-of-the-art approaches.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2026.
Builds on
32 of 81 references.
References · 32
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,568
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,682
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,389
- 2025A-MEM: Agentic Memory for LLM Agentscited by 1,063
- 2024A Survey on the Memory Mechanism of Large Language Model based Agentscited by 634
- 2024WildChat: 1M ChatGPT Interaction Logs in the Wildcited by 629
20 more
- 2019MemGuard: Defending against Black-Box Membership Inference Attacks via Adversarial Examplescited by 197
- 2023Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Modelscited by 175
- 2024Trust No Bot: Discovering Personal Disclosures in Human-LLM Conversations in the Wildcited by 47
- 2024FENICE: Factuality Evaluation of summarization based on Natural language Inference and Claim Extractioncited by 28
- 2024Large Language Models are Advanced Anonymizerscited by 22
- 2025Towards Effective Extraction and Evaluation of Factual Claimscited by 19
- 2025Depth Gives a False Sense of Privacy: LLM Internal States Inversioncited by 17
- 2024An In-Depth Investigation of Data Collection in LLM App Ecosystemscited by 14
- 2025Prεεmpt: Sanitizing Sensitive Prompts for LLMscited by 12
- 2024Robust Utility-Preserving Text Anonymization Based on Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2024Prompt Obfuscation for Large Language Modelscited by 10
- 2019Do Cookie Banners Respect my Choice? Measuring Legal Compliance of Banners from IAB Europe's Transparency and Consent Frameworkcited by 9
- 2025Operationalizing Data Minimization for Privacy-Preserving LLM Promptingcited by 8
- 2022Tracking, Profiling, and Ad Targeting in the Alexa Echo Smart Speaker Ecosystemcited by 7
- 2025PRvL: Quantifying the Capabilities and Risks of Large Language Models for PII Redactioncited by 7
- 2025Understanding Privacy Norms Around LLM-Based Chatbots: A Contextual Integrity Perspectivecited by 7
- 2020Privacy in Targeted Advertising: A Surveycited by 3
- 2026Tracking Conversations: Measuring Content and Identity Exposure on AI Chatbotscited by 3
- 2021HARPO: Learning to Subvert Online Behavioral Advertisingcited by 2
- 2025Beyond PII: How Users Attempt to Estimate and Mitigate Implicit LLM Inferencecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026An Empirical Study of Privacy Leakage Chains via Prompt Injection in Black-Box Chatbot Environments
- 2026Differential Privacy in Generative AI Agents: Analysis and Optimal Tradeoffs
- 2025Protecting Users From Themselves: Safeguarding Contextual Privacy in Interactions with Conversational Agents
- 2025PrivacyBench: A Conversational Benchmark for Evaluating Privacy in Personalized AI
- 2024EmojiPrompt: Generative Prompt Obfuscation for Privacy-Preserving Communication with Cloud-based LLMs
- 2025Sanitize Your Responses: Mitigating Privacy Leakage in Large Language Models
- 2025Privacy-R1: Privacy-Aware Multi-LLM Agent Collaboration via Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Has My System Prompt Been Used? Large Language Model Prompt Membership Inference