LaQual: An Automated Framework for LLM App Quality Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Representing a new paradigm in software distribution, LLM app stores are rapidly emerging, offering users diverse choices for content generation, coding assistance, education, and more. However, current ranking and recommendation mechanisms in LLM app stores predominantly rely on static metrics, such as user interactions and favorites, making it challenging for users to efficiently identify high-quality apps. At the same time, current academic research focuses on specific vertical fields and lacks a general, automated evaluation framework applicable to the diverse LLM app ecosystem. To address the above challenges, we present LaQual, an automated framework for LLM app quality evaluation. LaQual integrates three key stages: (1) LLM app labeling and hierarchical classification for precise scenario mapping; (2) static indicator evaluation using time-weighted user engagement and functional capability indicators to filter low-quality apps; and (3) dynamic scenario-adapted evaluation, where an LLM generates scenario-specific evaluation metrics, scoring criteria, and tasks for comprehensive quality evaluation. Experiments on a mainstream LLM app store demonstrate the effectiveness of LaQual. Its automated scores show high consistency with human judgments. Through effective screening, LaQual can reduce the candidate LLM app pool by 66.7% to 81.3%. User studies further validate its significant outperformance over baseline systems, particularly in comparison efficiency (mean 5.45 vs. 3.30) and value of explanatory information (4.75 vs. 2.25). These results demonstrate that LaQual provides a scalable, objective, and user-centric solution for high-quality discovery and recommendation of LLM apps in real-world scenarios.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2025.
Builds on
34 of 53 references.
References · 34
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
- 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
- 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,184
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
- 2023LegalBench: A Collaboratively Built Benchmark for Measuring Legal Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 336
- 2023CodeGeeX: A Pre-Trained Model for Code Generation with Multilingual Benchmarking on HumanEval-Xcited by 300
- 2023Assessing Cross-Cultural Alignment between ChatGPT and Human Societies: An Empirical Studycited by 206
- 2024Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferencescited by 144
- 2024FinBen: A Holistic Financial Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 141
22 more
- 2023Large language models in healthcare and medical domain: A reviewcited by 127
- 2024LegalAgentBench: Evaluating LLM Agents in Legal Domaincited by 59
- 2024Measuring Implicit Bias in Explicitly Unbiased Large Language Modelscited by 51
- 2024LexEval: A Comprehensive Chinese Legal Benchmark for Evaluating Large Language Modelscited by 37
- 2023Unlocking Practical Applications in Legal Domain: Evaluation of GPT for Zero-Shot Semantic Annotation of Legal Textscited by 33
- 2024CLAVE: An Adaptive Framework for Evaluating Values of LLM Generated Responsescited by 23
- 2024Evaluating and Aligning CodeLLMs on Human Preferencecited by 22
- 2024A First Look at GPT Apps: Landscape and Vulnerabilitycited by 16
- 2024On the (In)Security of LLM App Storescited by 14
- 2024An In-Depth Investigation of Data Collection in LLM App Ecosystemscited by 14
- 2024Towards Leveraging Large Language Models for Automated Medical Q&A Evaluationcited by 14
- 2021A Survey of Natural Language Generationcited by 13
- 2023Evaluation of ChatGPT-Generated Medical Responses: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysiscited by 13
- 2024LLM App Store Analysis: A Vision and Roadmapcited by 13
- 2024Exploring ChatGPT App Ecosystem: Distribution, Deployment and Securitycited by 12
- 2023Is ChatGPT a Financial Expert? Evaluating Language Models on Financial Natural Language Processingcited by 11
- 2023MobileRec: A Large-Scale Dataset for Mobile Apps Recommendationcited by 8
- 2024GPT Store Mining and Analysiscited by 5
- 2024GPTZoo: A Large-scale Dataset of GPTs for the Research Communitycited by 5
- 2024Legal Evalutions and Challenges of Large Language Modelscited by 4
- 2024LLM App Squatting and Cloningcited by 2
- 2025Software Engineering for Large Language Models: Research Status, Challenges and the Road Aheadcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.