mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PLM-Net: Perception Latency Mitigation Network for Vision-Based Lateral Control of Autonomous Vehicles

arXiv 2407.16740 ↗First posted 23 Jul 2024cs.RO cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: End-to-end autonomous driving → End-to-end system architecture

Abstract (arXiv)

This study introduces the Perception Latency Mitigation Network (PLM-Net), a modular deep learning framework designed to mitigate perception latency in vision-based imitation-learning lane-keeping systems. Perception latency, defined as the delay between visual sensing and steering actuation, can degrade lateral tracking performance and steering stability. While delay compensation has been extensively studied in classical predictive control systems, its treatment within vision-based imitation-learning architectures under constant and time-varying perception latency remains limited. Rather than reducing latency itself, PLM-Net mitigates its effect on control performance through a plug-in architecture that preserves the original control pipeline. The framework consists of a frozen Base Model (BM), representing an existing lane-keeping controller, and a Timed Action Prediction Model (TAPM), which predicts future steering actions corresponding to discrete latency conditions. Real-time mitigation is achieved by interpolating between model outputs according to the measured latency value, enabling adaptation to both constant and time-varying latency. The framework is evaluated in a closed-loop deterministic simulation environment under fixed-speed conditions to isolate the impact of perception latency. Results demonstrate significant reductions in steering error under multiple latency settings, achieving up to 62% and 78% reductions in Mean Absolute Error (MAE) for constant and time-varying latency cases, respectively. These findings demonstrate the architectural feasibility of modular latency mitigation for vision-based lateral control under controlled simulation settings. The project page including video demonstrations, code, and dataset is publicly released.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in End-to-end system architecture, one of 9 directions in End-to-end autonomous driving. Builds on 17 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jul 2024.

Builds on

17 of 53 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Combating the effects of speed and delays in end-to-end self-driving6 Dec
  2. 2022Trajectory-guided Control Prediction for End-to-end Autonomous Driving: A Simple yet Strong Baseline16 Jun

Other references · 15

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
  3. 2017End-to-end Driving via Conditional Imitation Learningcited by 479
  4. 2024PLUTO: Pushing the Limit of Imitation Learning-based Planning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 84
  5. 2017Explaining How a Deep Neural Network Trained with End-to-End Learning Steers a Carcited by 65
  6. 2021Cognitive science as a source of forward and inverse models of human decisions for robotics and controlcited by 22
  7. 2020Accurate, Low-Latency Visual Perception for Autonomous Racing:Challenges, Mechanisms, and Practical Solutionscited by 11
  8. 2019A Delay Metric for Video Object Detection: What Average Precision Fails to Tellcited by 9
  9. 2020DeepRacing: Parameterized Trajectories for Autonomous Racingcited by 7
  10. 2022SHAIL: Safety-Aware Hierarchical Adversarial Imitation Learning for Autonomous Driving in Urban Environmentscited by 5
  11. 2019Ultra-Reliable Low-Latency Communications in Autonomous Vehicular Networkscited by 3
  12. 2022Delay-aware Robust Control for Safe Autonomous Driving and Racingcited by 3
3 more
  1. 2023Addressing Limitations of State-Aware Imitation Learning for Autonomous Drivingcited by 3
  2. 2021Delay-aware Robust Control for Safe Autonomous Drivingcited by 2
  3. 2022Smooth and Low Latency Video Streaming for Autonomous Cars during Handovercited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021ObserveNet Control: A Vision-Dynamics Learning Approach to Predictive Control in Autonomous Vehicles
  2. 2026Directed Temporal Representations for Offline Visual Control
  3. 2025Prioritizing Perception-Guided Self-Supervision: A New Paradigm for Causal Modeling in End-to-End Autonomous Driving
  4. 2022Memory based neural networks for end-to-end autonomous driving
  5. 2025Imitation Learning for Autonomous Driving: Insights from Real-World Testing
  6. 2024A Sim-to-Real Vision-based Lane Keeping System for a 1:10-scale Autonomous Vehicle
  7. 2025WorldRFT: Latent World Model Planning with Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Autonomous Driving
  8. 2024Exploring Latent Pathways: Enhancing the Interpretability of Autonomous Driving with a Variational Autoencoder