Multi-Group Proportional Representation in Retrieval
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image search and retrieval tasks can perpetuate harmful stereotypes, erase cultural identities, and amplify social disparities. Current approaches to mitigate these representational harms balance the number of retrieved items across population groups defined by a small number of (often binary) attributes. However, most existing methods overlook intersectional groups determined by combinations of group attributes, such as gender, race, and ethnicity. We introduce Multi-Group Proportional Representation (MPR), a novel metric that measures representation across intersectional groups. We develop practical methods for estimating MPR, provide theoretical guarantees, and propose optimization algorithms to ensure MPR in retrieval. We demonstrate that existing methods optimizing for equal and proportional representation metrics may fail to promote MPR. Crucially, our work shows that optimizing MPR yields more proportional representation across multiple intersectional groups specified by a rich function class, often with minimal compromise in retrieval accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 50 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2024.
Builds on
50 of 98 references.
References · 50
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,679
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,477
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2016CVXPY: A Python-Embedded Modeling Language for Convex Optimizationcited by 633
- 2017Age Progression/Regression by Conditional Adversarial Autoencodercited by 426
- 2017Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairnesscited by 381
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
- 2023Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Modelscited by 225
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 221
- 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
38 more
- 2019A Framework for Understanding Sources of Harm throughout the Machine Learning Life Cyclecited by 192
- 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
- 2017A Rewriting System for Convex Optimization Problemscited by 178
- 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 152
- 2019Tightening Mutual Information Based Bounds on Generalization Errorcited by 117
- 2022A Prompt Array Keeps the Bias Away: Debiasing Vision-Language Models with Adversarial Learningcited by 104
- 2013Discrimination in Online Ad Deliverycited by 93
- 2021Are Gender-Neutral Queries Really Gender-Neutral? Mitigating Gender Bias in Image Searchcited by 90
- 2018Chaining Mutual Information and Tightening Generalization Boundscited by 65
- 2021Fairness in Rankings and Recommendations: An Overviewcited by 62
- 2023VisoGender: A dataset for benchmarking gender bias in image-text pronoun resolutioncited by 52
- 2018Fair and Diverse DPP-based Data Summarizationcited by 39
- 2023Exposing and Mitigating Spurious Correlations for Cross-Modal Retrievalcited by 35
- 2017Estimating Mutual Information for Discrete-Continuous Mixturescited by 34
- 2021Fairness for Image Generation with Uncertain Sensitive Attributescited by 31
- 2020Mitigating Bias in Set Selection with Noisy Protected Attributescited by 29
- 2022Markedness in Visual Semantic AIcited by 29
- 2019Fairness in representation: quantifying stereotyping as a representational harmcited by 26
- 2021Stakeholder Participation in AI: Beyond "Add Diverse Stakeholders and Stir"cited by 26
- 2020Sample Complexity of Uniform Convergence for Multicalibrationcited by 24
- 2023Taxonomizing and Measuring Representational Harms: A Look at Image Taggingcited by 24
- 2015Properties of Multiwinner Voting Rulescited by 20
- 2019Fast-rate PAC-Bayes Generalization Bounds via Shifted Rademacher Processescited by 20
- 2022FairCLIP: Social Bias Elimination based on Attribute Prototype Learning and Representation Neutralizationcited by 20
- 2023Mitigating Test-Time Bias for Fair Image Retrievalcited by 20
- 2022Integral Probability Metrics PAC-Bayes Boundscited by 19
- 2019Implicit Diversity in Image Summarizationcited by 18
- 2023HappyMap: A Generalized Multi-calibration Methodcited by 17
- 2024On Computationally Efficient Multi-Class Calibrationcited by 16
- 2014On the Computation of Fully Proportional Representationcited by 14
- 2014Finding a Collective Set of Items: From Proportional Multirepresentation to Group Recommendationcited by 13
- 2024From Melting Pots to Misrepresentations: Exploring Harms in Generative AIcited by 13
- 2023Word-Level Explanations for Analyzing Bias in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 8
- 2023A View From Somewhere: Human-Centric Face Representationscited by 6
- 2024Generalized People Diversity: Learning a Human Perception-Aligned Diversity Representation for People Imagescited by 6
- 2015Multi-Attribute Proportional Representationcited by 4
- 2023Multi-Group Fairness Evaluation via Conditional Value-at-Risk Testingcited by 3
- 2021Online Selection of Diverse Committeescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.
- 2026WARP: Wasserstein-Aligned RAG for Population Opinions24 Aug 2026
- 2025Multi-Group Proportional Representation for Text-to-Image Models29 May 2025