Generalized People Diversity: Learning a Human Perception-Aligned Diversity Representation for People Images
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Capturing the diversity of people in images is challenging: recent literature tends to focus on diversifying one or two attributes, requiring expensive attribute labels or building classifiers. We introduce a diverse people image ranking method which more flexibly aligns with human notions of people diversity in a less prescriptive, label-free manner. The Perception-Aligned Text-derived Human representation Space (PATHS) aims to capture all or many relevant features of people-related diversity, and, when used as the representation space in the standard Maximal Marginal Relevance (MMR) ranking algorithm, is better able to surface a range of types of people-related diversity (e.g. disability, cultural attire). PATHS is created in two stages. First, a text-guided approach is used to extract a person-diversity representation from a pre-trained image-text model. Then this representation is fine-tuned on perception judgments from human annotators so that it captures the aspects of people-related similarity that humans find most salient. Empirical results show that the PATHS method achieves diversity better than baseline methods, according to side-by-side ratings from human annotators.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jan 2024.
Builds on
34 of 69 references.
References · 34
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,304
- 2017In Defense of the Triplet Loss for Person Re-Identificationcited by 784
- 2014Deep metric learning using Triplet networkcited by 421
- 2023Aligning Text-to-Image Models using Human Feedbackcited by 418
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2021Dealing with Disagreements: Looking Beyond the Majority Vote in Subjective Annotationscited by 306
- 2020Large image datasets: A pyrrhic win for computer vision?cited by 237
- 2022DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 230
- 2015The Variational Fair Autoencodercited by 223
- 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
22 more
- 2015Censoring Representations with an Adversarycited by 191
- 2014Learning Fine-grained Image Similarity with Deep Rankingcited by 189
- 2019Towards Fairer Datasets: Filtering and Balancing the Distribution of the People Subtree in the ImageNet Hierarchycited by 156
- 2017No Classification without Representation: Assessing Geodiversity Issues in Open Data Sets for the Developing Worldcited by 152
- 2023Fair Diffusion: Instructing Text-to-Image Generation Models on Fairnesscited by 149
- 2023Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Promptscited by 147
- 2022Does CLIP Bind Concepts? Probing Compositionality in Large Image Modelscited by 101
- 2018Learning Controllable Fair Representationscited by 83
- 2022Is Your Toxicity My Toxicity? Exploring the Impact of Rater Identity on Toxicity Annotationcited by 67
- 2022CrowdWorkSheets: Accounting for Individual and Collective Identities Underlying Crowdsourced Dataset Annotationcited by 59
- 2021A Step Toward More Inclusive People Annotations for Fairnesscited by 46
- 2018Fair and Diverse DPP-based Data Summarizationcited by 39
- 2015Fine-grained Categorization and Dataset Bootstrapping using Deep Metric Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 25
- 2023Consensus and Subjectivity of Skin Tone Annotation for ML Fairnesscited by 22
- 2022CLIP-PAE: Projection-Augmentation Embedding to Extract Relevant Features for a Disentangled, Interpretable, and Controllable Text-Guided Face Manipulationcited by 19
- 2016How to be Fair and Diverse?cited by 18
- 2019Implicit Diversity in Image Summarizationcited by 18
- 2018Using Image Fairness Representations in Diversity-Based Re-ranking for Recommendationscited by 11
- 2023The Reasonable Effectiveness of Diverse Evaluation Datacited by 10
- 2020Gender Classification and Bias Mitigation in Facial Imagescited by 8
- 2023A View From Somewhere: Human-Centric Face Representationscited by 6
- 2023Representation Online Matters: Practical End-to-End Diversification in Search and Recommender Systemscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 1.
6 papers.
- 2024Beyond Aesthetics: Cultural Competence in Text-to-Image Modelscited by 30
- 2024Diversity-Rewarded CFG Distillationcited by 9
- 2024A Survey on Responsible Generative AI: What to Generate and What Notcited by 8
- 2025Multi-Group Proportional Representation for Text-to-Image Modelscited by 3
- 2024Crossroads of Continents: Automated Artifact Extraction for Cultural Adaptation with Large Multimodal Modelscited by 2
- 2024Multi-Group Proportional Representation in Retrievalcited by 2
- 2025Multi-Group Proportional Representation for Text-to-Image Models29 May 2025
- 2024Diversity-Rewarded CFG Distillation8 Oct 2024
- 2024Multi-Group Proportional Representation in Retrieval11 Jul 2024
- 2024Beyond Aesthetics: Cultural Competence in Text-to-Image Models9 Jul 2024
- 2024Crossroads of Continents: Automated Artifact Extraction for Cultural Adaptation with Large Multimodal Models2 Jul 2024
- 2024A Survey on Responsible Generative AI: What to Generate and What Not8 Apr 2024