Multi-Group Proportional Representation for Text-to-Image Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Text-to-image (T2I) generative models can create vivid, realistic images from textual descriptions. As these models proliferate, they expose new concerns about their ability to represent diverse demographic groups, propagate stereotypes, and efface minority populations. Despite growing attention to the "safe" and "responsible" design of artificial intelligence (AI), there is no established methodology to systematically measure and control representational harms in image generation. This paper introduces a novel framework to measure the representation of intersectional groups in images generated by T2I models by applying the Multi-Group Proportional Representation (MPR) metric. MPR evaluates the worst-case deviation of representation statistics across given population groups in images produced by a generative model, allowing for flexible and context-specific measurements based on user requirements. We also develop an algorithm to optimize T2I models for this metric. Through experiments, we demonstrate that MPR can effectively measure representation statistics across multiple intersectional groups and, when used as a training objective, can guide models toward a more balanced generation across demographic groups while maintaining generation quality.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2025.
Builds on
33 of 65 references.
References · 33
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023SDXL: Improving Latent Diffusion Models for High-Resolution Image Synthesiscited by 4,356
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
- 2023Latent Consistency Models: Synthesizing High-Resolution Images with Few-Step Inferencecited by 846
- 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 780
- 2023Unified Concept Editing in Diffusion Modelscited by 388
- 2024PixArt-Sigma: Weak-to-Strong Training of Diffusion Transformer for 4K Text-to-Image Generationcited by 329
- 2022Easily Accessible Text-to-Image Generation Amplifies Demographic Stereotypes at Large Scalecited by 262
- 2024Playground v2.5: Three Insights towards Enhancing Aesthetic Quality in Text-to-Image Generationcited by 256
- 2022DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 230
- 2023Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Modelscited by 226
21 more
- 2018Multiaccuracy: Black-Box Post-Processing for Fairness in Classificationcited by 222
- 2023Fair Diffusion: Instructing Text-to-Image Generation Models on Fairnesscited by 151
- 2023Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Promptscited by 149
- 2023Editing Implicit Assumptions in Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 130
- 2022How well can Text-to-Image Generative Models understand Ethical Natural Language Interventions?cited by 92
- 2023Finetuning Text-to-Image Diffusion Models for Fairnesscited by 92
- 2024Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigationcited by 66
- 2023ITI-GEN: Inclusive Text-to-Image Generationcited by 64
- 2024OpenBias: Open-set Bias Detection in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 61
- 2023Concept Algebra for (Score-Based) Text-Controlled Generative Modelscited by 59
- 2023TIBET: Identifying and Evaluating Biases in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 52
- 2024Balancing Act: Distribution-Guided Debiasing in Diffusion Modelscited by 52
- 2023Fair Text-to-Image Diffusion via Fair Mappingcited by 31
- 2023Factoring the Matrix of Domination: A Critical Review and Reimagination of Intersectionality in AI Fairnesscited by 26
- 2023A Friendly Face: Do Text-to-Image Systems Rely on Stereotypes when the Input is Under-Specified?cited by 25
- 2024Training Unbiased Diffusion Models From Biased Datasetcited by 25
- 2024Fair Sampling in Diffusion Models through Switching Mechanismcited by 12
- 2024MIST: Mitigating Intersectional Bias with Disentangled Cross-Attention Editing in Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 10
- 2024Generalized People Diversity: Learning a Human Perception-Aligned Diversity Representation for People Imagescited by 6
- 2024Controlling the Fidelity and Diversity of Deep Generative Models via Pseudo Densitycited by 3
- 2024Multi-Group Proportional Representation in Retrievalcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2026TP-Blend: Textual-Prompt Attention Pairing for Precise Object-Style Blending in Diffusion Modelscited by 4
- 2025FAME: Fairness-aware Attention-modulated Video Editingcited by 2
- 2026Operationalizing Fairness in Text-to-Image Models: A Survey of Bias, Fairness Audits and Mitigation Strategiescited by 0
- 2026Operationalizing Fairness in Text-to-Image Models: A Survey of Bias, Fairness Audits and Mitigation Strategies15 Apr 2026
- 2026TP-Blend: Textual-Prompt Attention Pairing for Precise Object-Style Blending in Diffusion Models12 Jan 2026
- 2025FAME: Fairness-aware Attention-modulated Video Editing27 Oct 2025