Implicit Diversity in Image Summarization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Studies have shown that the people depicted in image search results tend to be of majority groups with respect to socially salient attributes. This skew goes beyond that which already exists in the world - e.g., Kay et al. showed that although 28% of CEOs in US are women, only 10% of the top 100 results for CEO in Google Image Search are women. Most existing approaches to correct for this kind of bias assume that the images of people include socially salient attribute labels. However, such labels are often unknown. Further, using automated techniques to infer these labels may often not be possible within acceptable accuracy ranges, and may not be desirable due to the additional biases this process could incur. We develop a novel approach that takes as input a visibly diverse control set of images and uses this set to select a set of images of people in response to a query. The goal is to have a resulting set that is more visibly diverse in a manner that emulates the diversity depicted in the control set. Importantly, this approach does not require images to be labelled at any point; effectively, it gives a way to implicitly diversify the set of images selected. We provide two variants of our approach: the first is a modification of the MMR algorithm to incorporate the diversity scores, and second is a more efficient variant that does not consider within-list redundancy. We evaluate these approaches empirically on two datasets 1) a new dataset containing top Google image results for 96 occupations, for which we evaluate gender and skin-tone diversity with respect to occupations and 2) the CelebA dataset for which we evaluate gender diversity with respect to facial features. Our approaches produce image sets that significantly improve the visible diversity of the results, compared to current Google search and other diverse image summarization algorithms, at a minimal cost to accuracy.
Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 29 Jan 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 2; 2023: 6; 2024: 4; 2025: 2.
18 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2021PRISM: A Rich Class of Parameterized Submodular Information Measures for Guided Subset Selectioncited by 51
- 2023Survey of Social Bias in Vision-Language Modelscited by 26
- 2021A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 24
- 2021When Fair Ranking Meets Uncertain Inferencecited by 22
- 2023Consensus and Subjectivity of Skin Tone Annotation for ML Fairnesscited by 22
- 2023Mitigating Test-Time Bias for Fair Image Retrievalcited by 20
- 2022Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected Attributescited by 17
- 2024Fairness and Bias Mitigation in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 13
- 2023Skin Deep: Investigating Subjectivity in Skin Tone Annotations for Computer Vision Benchmark Datasetscited by 11
- 2024Generalized People Diversity: Learning a Human Perception-Aligned Diversity Representation for People Imagescited by 6
- 2025Can we Debias Social Stereotypes in AI-Generated Images? Examining Text-to-Image Outputs and User Perceptionscited by 6
- 2022Subverting Fair Image Search with Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 5
6 more
- 2025Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Securitycited by 4
- 2023Challenges and Solutions in AI for Allcited by 3
- 2021Auditing for Diversity using Representative Examplescited by 2
- 2023Sampling Individually-Fair Rankings that are Always Group Faircited by 2
- 2024Multi-Group Proportional Representation in Retrievalcited by 2
- 2024FaceSaliencyAug: Mitigating Geographic, Gender and Stereotypical Biases via Saliency-Based Data Augmentationcited by 0
- 2025Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Security16 Jun 2025
- 2025Can we Debias Social Stereotypes in AI-Generated Images? Examining Text-to-Image Outputs and User Perceptions27 May 2025
- 2024FaceSaliencyAug: Mitigating Geographic, Gender and Stereotypical Biases via Saliency-Based Data Augmentation17 Oct 2024
- 2024Fairness and Bias Mitigation in Computer Vision: A Survey5 Aug 2024
- 2024Multi-Group Proportional Representation in Retrieval11 Jul 2024
- 2024Generalized People Diversity: Learning a Human Perception-Aligned Diversity Representation for People Images25 Jan 2024
- 2023Survey of Social Bias in Vision-Language Models24 Sep 2023
- 2023Challenges and Solutions in AI for All20 Jul 2023
- 2023Sampling Individually-Fair Rankings that are Always Group Fair21 Jun 2023
- 2023Mitigating Test-Time Bias for Fair Image Retrieval23 May 2023
- 2023Consensus and Subjectivity of Skin Tone Annotation for ML Fairness16 May 2023
- 2023Skin Deep: Investigating Subjectivity in Skin Tone Annotations for Computer Vision Benchmark Datasets15 May 2023
6 more
- 2022Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected Attributes30 Nov 2022
- 2022Subverting Fair Image Search with Generative Adversarial Perturbations5 May 2022
- 2021A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairness27 Sep 2021
- 2021Auditing for Diversity using Representative Examples15 Jul 2021
- 2021When Fair Ranking Meets Uncertain Inference5 May 2021
- 2021PRISM: A Rich Class of Parameterized Submodular Information Measures for Guided Subset Selection27 Feb 2021
- 2023Survey of Social Bias in Vision-Language Modelscited by 26
- 2023Survey of Social Bias in Vision-Language Models24 Sep 2023
- 2021PRISM: A Rich Class of Parameterized Submodular Information Measures for Guided Subset Selectioncited by 51
- 2021A Sociotechnical View of Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 24
- 2021When Fair Ranking Meets Uncertain Inferencecited by 22
- 2023Consensus and Subjectivity of Skin Tone Annotation for ML Fairnesscited by 22
- 2023Mitigating Test-Time Bias for Fair Image Retrievalcited by 20
- 2022Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected Attributescited by 17
- 2024Fairness and Bias Mitigation in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 13
- 2023Skin Deep: Investigating Subjectivity in Skin Tone Annotations for Computer Vision Benchmark Datasetscited by 11
- 2024Generalized People Diversity: Learning a Human Perception-Aligned Diversity Representation for People Imagescited by 6
- 2025Can we Debias Social Stereotypes in AI-Generated Images? Examining Text-to-Image Outputs and User Perceptionscited by 6
- 2022Subverting Fair Image Search with Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 5
- 2025Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Securitycited by 4
12 most cited of 17 All 17 (JSON)
- 2025Position: Certified Robustness Does Not (Yet) Imply Model Security16 Jun 2025
- 2025Can we Debias Social Stereotypes in AI-Generated Images? Examining Text-to-Image Outputs and User Perceptions27 May 2025
- 2024FaceSaliencyAug: Mitigating Geographic, Gender and Stereotypical Biases via Saliency-Based Data Augmentation17 Oct 2024
- 2024Fairness and Bias Mitigation in Computer Vision: A Survey5 Aug 2024
- 2024Multi-Group Proportional Representation in Retrieval11 Jul 2024
- 2024Generalized People Diversity: Learning a Human Perception-Aligned Diversity Representation for People Images25 Jan 2024
- 2023Challenges and Solutions in AI for All20 Jul 2023
- 2023Sampling Individually-Fair Rankings that are Always Group Fair21 Jun 2023
- 2023Mitigating Test-Time Bias for Fair Image Retrieval23 May 2023
- 2023Consensus and Subjectivity of Skin Tone Annotation for ML Fairness16 May 2023
- 2023Skin Deep: Investigating Subjectivity in Skin Tone Annotations for Computer Vision Benchmark Datasets15 May 2023
- 2022Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected Attributes30 Nov 2022
12 newest of 17 All 17 (JSON)