mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On Computationally Efficient Multi-Class Calibration

arXiv 2402.07821 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.CC cs.DScited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Consider a multi-class labelling problem, where the labels can take values in [k], and a predictor predicts a distribution over the labels. In this work, we study the following foundational question: Are there notions of multi-class calibration that give strong guarantees of meaningful predictions and can be achieved in time and sample complexities polynomial in k? Prior notions of calibration exhibit a tradeoff between computational efficiency and expressivity: they either suffer from having sample complexity exponential in k, or needing to solve computationally intractable problems, or give rather weak guarantees. Our main contribution is a notion of calibration that achieves all these desiderata: we formulate a robust notion of projected smooth calibration for multi-class predictions, and give new recalibration algorithms for efficiently calibrating predictors under this definition with complexity polynomial in k. Projected smooth calibration gives strong guarantees for all downstream decision makers who want to use the predictor for binary classification problems of the form: does the label belong to a subset T subseteq [k]: e.g. is this an image of an animal? It ensures that the probabilities predicted by summing the probabilities assigned to labels in T are close to some perfectly calibrated binary predictor for that task. We also show that natural strengthenings of our definition are computationally hard to achieve: they run into information theoretic barriers or computational intractability. Underlying both our upper and lower bounds is a tight connection that we prove between multi-class calibration and the well-studied problem of agnostic learning in the (standard) binary prediction setting.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2024.

Builds on

22 of 44 references.

References · 22

  1. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  2. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 777
  3. 2019Beyond temperature scaling: Obtaining well-calibrated multiclass probabilities with Dirichlet calibrationcited by 359
  4. 2021Calibrating Predictions to Decisions: A Novel Approach to Multi-Class Calibrationcited by 79
  5. 2020Outcome Indistinguishabilitycited by 74
  6. 2014On the Computational Efficiency of Training Neural Networkscited by 71
  7. 2021Omnipredictorscited by 71
  8. 2022Batch Multivalid Conformal Predictioncited by 66
  9. 2022Practical Adversarial Multivalid Conformal Predictioncited by 65
  10. 2022Loss Minimization through the Lens of Outcome Indistinguishabilitycited by 61
  11. 2022A Unifying Theory of Distance from Calibrationcited by 51
  12. 2015Complexity Theoretic Limitations on Learning Halfspacescited by 50
10 more
  1. 2021Online Multivalid Learning: Means, Moments, and Prediction Intervalscited by 48
  2. 2021Top-label calibration and multiclass-to-binary reductionscited by 46
  3. 2023U-Calibration: Forecasting for an Unknown Agentcited by 46
  4. 2022Low-Degree Multicalibrationcited by 44
  5. 2023High-Dimensional Prediction for Sequential Decision Makingcited by 41
  6. 2016Reliably Learning the ReLU in Polynomial Timecited by 36
  7. 2022Smooth Calibration, Leaky Forecasts, Finite Recall, and Nash Dynamicscited by 22
  8. 2013From average case complexity to improper learning complexitycited by 16
  9. 2023From Pseudorandomness to Multi-Group Fairness and Backcited by 13
  10. 2020From Boltzmann Machines to Neural Networks and Back Againcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 4; 2025: 9; 2026: 3.

16 papers.

Sort: