Bias in Text Embedding Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Text embedding is becoming an increasingly popular AI methodology, especially among businesses, yet the potential of text embedding models to be biased is not well understood. This paper examines the degree to which a selection of popular text embedding models are biased, particularly along gendered dimensions. More specifically, this paper studies the degree to which these models associate a list of given professions with gendered terms. The analysis reveals that text embedding models are prone to gendered biases but in varying ways. Although there are certain inter-model commonalities, for instance, greater association of professions like nurse, homemaker, and socialite with female identifiers, and greater association of professions like CEO, manager, and boss with male identifiers, not all models make the same gendered associations for each occupation. Furthermore, the magnitude and directionality of bias can also vary on a model-by-model basis and depend on the particular words models are prompted with. This paper demonstrates that gender bias afflicts text embedding models and suggests that businesses using this technology need to be mindful of the specific dimensions of this problem.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2024.
Builds on
20 of 37 references.
References · 20
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,462
- 2022Beyond the Imitation Game: Quantifying and extrapolating the capabilities of language modelscited by 1,970
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2016Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biasescited by 894
- 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
- 2018Universal Sentence Encodercited by 485
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolutioncited by 438
- 2019Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Themcited by 268
- 2023Gender bias and stereotypes in Large Language Modelscited by 185
8 more
- 2023Fairness And Bias in Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey of Sources, Impacts, And Mitigation Strategiescited by 83
- 2019Evaluating Word Embedding Models: Methods and Experimental Resultscited by 37
- 2023Language Models Get a Gender Makeover: Mitigating Gender Bias with Few-Shot Data Interventionscited by 28
- 2024Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2024cited by 22
- 2022The AI Index 2022 Annual Reportcited by 18
- 2023Artificial Intelligence Index Report 2023cited by 13
- 2024Enhancing Embedding Performance through Large Language Model-based Text Enrichment and Rewritingcited by 6
- 2023Learning from Red Teaming: Gender Bias Provocation and Mitigation in Large Language Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.