mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Best of Both Worlds Model Selection

arXiv 2206.14912 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the problem of model selection in bandit scenarios in the presence of nested policy classes, with the goal of obtaining simultaneous adversarial and stochastic ("best of both worlds") high-probability regret guarantees. Our approach requires that each base learner comes with a candidate regret bound that may or may not hold, while our meta algorithm plays each base learner according to a schedule that keeps the base learner's candidate regret bounds balanced until they are detected to violate their guarantees. We develop careful mis-specification tests specifically designed to blend the above model selection criterion with the ability to leverage the (potentially benign) nature of the environment. We recover the model selection guarantees of the CORRAL algorithm for adversarial environments, but with the additional benefit of achieving high probability regret bounds, specifically in the case of nested adversarial linear bandits. More importantly, our model selection results also hold simultaneously in stochastic environments under gap assumptions. These are the first theoretical results that achieve best of both world (stochastic and adversarial) guarantees while performing model selection in (linear) bandit scenarios.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2022.

Builds on

22 of 36 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018Tsallis-INF: An Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 123
  2. 2015Explore no more: Improved high-probability regret bounds for non-stochastic banditscited by 120
  3. 2018Stochastic bandits robust to adversarial corruptionscited by 118
  4. 2018More Adaptive Algorithms for Adversarial Banditscited by 114
  5. 2016Corralling a Band of Bandit Algorithmscited by 99
  6. 2019Better Algorithms for Stochastic Bandits with Adversarial Corruptionscited by 91
  7. 2021Adapting to Misspecification in Contextual Banditscited by 81
  8. 2020Model Selection in Contextual Stochastic Bandit Problemscited by 71
  9. 2019Model selection for contextual banditscited by 60
  10. 2021Achieving Near Instance-Optimality and Minimax-Optimality in Stochastic and Adversarial Linear Bandits Simultaneouslycited by 48
  11. 2016An algorithm with nearly optimal pseudo-regret for both stochastic and adversarial banditscited by 47
  12. 2020Regret Bound Balancing and Elimination for Model Selection in Bandits and RLcited by 45
10 more
  1. 2021A Model Selection Approach for Corruption Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 45
  2. 2017An Improved Parametrization and Analysis of the EXP3++ Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 43
  3. 2019OSOM: A simultaneously optimal algorithm for multi-armed and linear contextual banditscited by 28
  4. 2020Online Model Selection for Reinforcement Learning with Function Approximationcited by 28
  5. 2020Problem-Complexity Adaptive Model Selection for Stochastic Linear Banditscited by 26
  6. 2021The Pareto Frontier of model selection for general Contextual Banditscited by 24
  7. 2020Corralling Stochastic Bandit Algorithmscited by 23
  8. 2020Regret Balancing for Bandit and RL Model Selectioncited by 20
  9. 2021Pareto Optimal Model Selection in Linear Banditscited by 14
  10. 2020Rate-adaptive model selection over a collection of black-box contextual bandit algorithmscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 4; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

11 papers.