Best-of-Both Worlds for linear contextual bandits with paid observations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study linear contextual bandits with paid observations, where at each round the learner observes a context, selects an action, and may pay a fixed cost to observe feedback from a subset of arms. We propose two Follow-the-Regularized-Leader algorithms with Best-of-Both-Worlds guarantees. The first, Agg-SPB, extends the SPB-matching framework of Tsuchiya and Ito (2024) by aggregating context-dependent stability terms, achieving the characteristic T2/3 adversarial regret rate and logarithmic dependence on T in stochastic environments. The second, CE-SPB, combines arm-dependent observation probabilities with an entropy-adaptive learning rate inspired by Kuroki et al. (2024). It achieves an entropy-adaptive widetildeO(T2/3) adversarial guarantee and polylogarithmic stochastic regret, while avoiding the minimum-context-mass dependence arising in the stochastic analysis of Agg-SPB. Both algorithms further extend to corrupted stochastic environments with explicit corruption-dependent guarantees. These results establish that logarithmic stochastic regret is compatible with the T2/3 adversarial regime for linear contextual bandits with paid observations, while highlighting a tradeoff between sharper horizon dependence in stochastic settings and path-dependent matching without explicit minimum-context-mass dependence.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Oct 2025.
Builds on
22 of 48 references.
References · 22
- 2018Tsallis-INF: An Optimal Algorithm for Stochastic and Adversarial Banditscited by 123
- 2015Explore no more: Improved high-probability regret bounds for non-stochastic banditscited by 120
- 2017Mostly Exploration-Free Algorithms for Contextual Banditscited by 85
- 2016The End of Optimism? An Asymptotic Analysis of Finite-Armed Linear Banditscited by 49
- 2020Efficient and Robust Algorithms for Adversarial Linear Contextual Banditscited by 42
- 2020Information Directed Sampling for Linear Partial Monitoringcited by 39
- 2023A Blackbox Approach to Best of Both Worlds in Bandits and Beyondcited by 29
- 2013From Bandits to Experts: A Tale of Domination and Independencecited by 28
- 2013An efficient algorithm for learning with semi-bandit feedbackcited by 21
- 2020Structure Adaptive Algorithms for Stochastic Banditscited by 19
- 2023First- and Second-Order Bounds for Adversarial Linear Contextual Banditscited by 19
- 2023Improved Best-of-Both-Worlds Guarantees for Multi-Armed Bandits: FTRL with General Regularizers and Multiple Optimal Armscited by 18
10 more
- 2022A Near-Optimal Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithm for Online Learning with Feedback Graphscited by 17
- 2022Better Best of Both Worlds Bounds for Bandits with Switching Costscited by 13
- 2023Improved Algorithms for Stochastic Linear Bandits Using Tail Bounds for Martingale Mixturescited by 12
- 2021Confidence-Budget Matching for Sequential Budgeted Learningcited by 11
- 2024Adaptive Learning Rate for Follow-the-Regularized-Leader: Competitive Analysis and Best-of-Both-Worldscited by 11
- 2023Best-of-Both-Worlds Algorithms for Linear Contextual Banditscited by 10
- 2025When and why randomised exploration works (in linear bandits)cited by 8
- 2024LC-Tsallis-INF: Generalized Best-of-Both-Worlds Linear Contextual Banditscited by 4
- 2024A Simple and Adaptive Learning Rate for FTRL in Online Learning with Minimax Regret of Theta(T2/3) and its Application to Best-of-Both-Worldscited by 3
- 2023Best-of-Both-Worlds Linear Contextual Banditscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.