Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning via Aligned Experience Estimation
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Preference-based reinforcement learning (PbRL) has shown impressive capabilities in training agents without reward engineering. However, a notable limitation of PbRL is its dependency on substantial human feedback. This dependency stems from the learning loop, which entails accurate reward learning compounded with value/policy learning, necessitating a considerable number of samples. To boost the learning loop, we propose SEER, an efficient PbRL method that integrates label smoothing and policy regularization techniques. Label smoothing reduces overfitting of the reward model by smoothing human preference labels. Additionally, we bootstrap a conservative estimate widehatQ using well-supported state-action pairs from the current replay memory to mitigate overestimation bias and utilize it for policy learning regularization. Our experimental results across a variety of complex tasks, both in online and offline settings, demonstrate that our approach improves feedback efficiency, outperforming state-of-the-art methods by a large margin. Ablation studies further reveal that SEER achieves a more accurate Q-function compared to prior work.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 42 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 May 2024.
Builds on
42 of 56 references.
Closest ancestors · 9
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Beyond Reward: Offline Preference-guided Policy Optimization25 May
- 2023Inverse Preference Learning: Preference-based RL without a Reward Function24 May
- 2022Non-Markovian Reward Modelling from Trajectory Labels via Interpretable Multiple Instance Learning30 May
- 2022Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning24 May
- 2022SURF: Semi-supervised Reward Learning with Data Augmentation for Feedback-efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning18 Mar
- 2021Skill Preferences: Learning to Extract and Execute Robotic Skills from Human Feedback11 Aug
- 2021PEBBLE: Feedback-Efficient Interactive Reinforcement Learning via Relabeling Experience and Unsupervised Pre-training9 Jun
- 2018Reward learning from human preferences and demonstrations in Atari15 Nov
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun
Other references · 33
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,211
- 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
- 2020Offline Reinforcement Learning: Tutorial, Review, and Perspectives on Open Problemscited by 1,873
- 2020Conservative Q-Learning for Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,777
- 2020D4RL: Datasets for Deep Data-Driven Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,406
- 2021Offline Reinforcement Learning with Implicit Q-Learningcited by 1,245
21 more
- 2018Off-Policy Deep Reinforcement Learning without Explorationcited by 1,227
- 2019Meta-World: A Benchmark and Evaluation for Multi-Task and Meta Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,168
- 2019Dota 2 with Large Scale Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 1,084
- 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
- 2021A Minimalist Approach to Offline Reinforcement Learningcited by 882
- 2019Stabilizing Off-Policy Q-Learning via Bootstrapping Error Reductioncited by 833
- 2020AWAC: Accelerating Online Reinforcement Learning with Offline Datasetscited by 647
- 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 484
- 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 372
- 2020dm_control: Software and Tasks for Continuous Controlcited by 368
- 2016Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulation with Asynchronous Off-Policy Updatescited by 342
- 2021Recursively Summarizing Books with Human Feedbackcited by 287
- 2023Extreme Q-Learning: MaxEnt RL without Entropycited by 113
- 2022Few-Shot Preference Learning for Human-in-the-Loop RLcited by 85
- 2023Preference Transformer: Modeling Human Preferences using Transformers for RLcited by 77
- 2018Sample-Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning via Episodic Backward Updatecited by 29
- 2016Visual Closed-Loop Control for Pouring Liquidscited by 26
- 2016Collective Robot Reinforcement Learning with Distributed Asynchronous Guided Policy Searchcited by 25
- 2022Topological Experience Replaycited by 17
- 2019Reverse Experience Replaycited by 8
- 2023DRL-Based Trajectory Tracking for Motion-Related Modules in Autonomous Drivingcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 6.
9 papers.
- 2024Bench2Drive: Towards Multi-Ability Benchmarking of Closed-Loop End-To-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 250
- 2025Raw2Drive: Reinforcement Learning with Aligned World Models for End-to-End Autonomous Driving (in CARLA v2)cited by 45
- 2025Spec-VLA: Speculative Decoding for Vision-Language-Action Models with Relaxed Acceptancecited by 31
- 2024RAT: Adversarial Attacks on Deep Reinforcement Agents for Targeted Behaviorscited by 16
- 2025Coarse-to-Fine Grounded Memory for LLM Agent Planningcited by 16
- 2024Utilize the Flow before Stepping into the Same River Twice: Certainty Represented Knowledge Flow for Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuningcited by 10
- 2025VLP: Vision-Language Preference Learning for Embodied Manipulationcited by 8
- 2025β-DQN: Improving Deep Q-Learning By Evolving the Behaviorcited by 3
- 2025STAIR: Addressing Stage Misalignment through Temporal-Aligned Preference Reinforcement Learningcited by 3
- 2025STAIR: Addressing Stage Misalignment through Temporal-Aligned Preference Reinforcement Learning28 Sep 2025
- 2025Coarse-to-Fine Grounded Memory for LLM Agent Planning21 Aug 2025
- 2025Spec-VLA: Speculative Decoding for Vision-Language-Action Models with Relaxed Acceptance30 Jul 2025
- 2025Raw2Drive: Reinforcement Learning with Aligned World Models for End-to-End Autonomous Driving (in CARLA v2)22 May 2025
- 2025VLP: Vision-Language Preference Learning for Embodied Manipulation17 Feb 2025
- 2025β-DQN: Improving Deep Q-Learning By Evolving the Behavior1 Jan 2025
- 2024RAT: Adversarial Attacks on Deep Reinforcement Agents for Targeted Behaviors14 Dec 2024
- 2024Utilize the Flow before Stepping into the Same River Twice: Certainty Represented Knowledge Flow for Refusal-Aware Instruction Tuning9 Oct 2024
- 2024Bench2Drive: Towards Multi-Ability Benchmarking of Closed-Loop End-To-End Autonomous Driving6 Jun 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Query-Policy Misalignment in Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning
- 2024Sample-Efficient Preference-based Reinforcement Learning with Dynamics Aware Rewards
- 2026From Reward-Free Representations to Preferences: Rethinking Offline Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning
- 2025Policy-labeled Preference Learning: Is Preference Enough for RLHF?
- 2023Direct Preference-based Policy Optimization without Reward Modeling
- 2025Best Policy Learning from Trajectory Preference Feedback
- 2025Similarity as Reward Alignment: Robust and Versatile Preference-based Reinforcement Learning
- 2024In-Dataset Trajectory Return Regularization for Offline Preference-based Reinforcement Learning