mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Are You Copying My Prompt? Protecting the Copyright of Vision Prompt for VPaaS via Watermark

arXiv 2405.15161 ↗First posted 24 May 2024cs.CR cs.CVcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Visual Prompt Learning (VPL) differs from traditional fine-tuning methods in reducing significant resource consumption by avoiding updating pre-trained model parameters. Instead, it focuses on learning an input perturbation, a visual prompt, added to downstream task data for making predictions. Since learning generalizable prompts requires expert design and creation, which is technically demanding and time-consuming in the optimization process, developers of Visual Prompts as a Service (VPaaS) have emerged. These developers profit by providing well-crafted prompts to authorized customers. However, a significant drawback is that prompts can be easily copied and redistributed, threatening the intellectual property of VPaaS developers. Hence, there is an urgent need for technology to protect the rights of VPaaS developers. To this end, we present a method named WVPrompt that employs visual prompt watermarking in a black-box way. WVPrompt consists of two parts: prompt watermarking and prompt verification. Specifically, it utilizes a poison-only backdoor attack method to embed a watermark into the prompt and then employs a hypothesis-testing approach for remote verification of prompt ownership. Extensive experiments have been conducted on three well-known benchmark datasets using three popular pre-trained models: RN50, BIT-M, and Instagram. The experimental results demonstrate that WVPrompt is efficient, harmless, and robust to various adversarial operations.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.

Builds on

36 of 51 references.

References · 36

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  4. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  5. 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
  6. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
  7. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 769
  8. 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
  9. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
  10. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
  11. 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 357
  12. 2020Invisible Backdoor Attack with Sample-Specific Triggerscited by 353
24 more
  1. 2022Exploring Visual Prompts for Adapting Large-Scale Modelscited by 274
  2. 2022Visual Prompting via Image Inpaintingcited by 250
  3. 2017Embedding Watermarks into Deep Neural Networkscited by 248
  4. 2018Adversarial Reprogramming of Neural Networkscited by 116
  5. 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 116
  6. 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Test-time Domain Adaptationcited by 97
  7. 2022Understanding and Improving Visual Prompting: A Label-Mapping Perspectivecited by 87
  8. 2022Untargeted Backdoor Watermark: Towards Harmless and Stealthy Dataset Copyright Protectioncited by 86
  9. 2020Transfer Learning without Knowing: Reprogramming Black-box Machine Learning Models with Scarce Data and Limited Resourcescited by 83
  10. 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Generative Transfer Learningcited by 75
  11. 2021A survey of deep neural network watermarking techniquescited by 73
  12. 2021SoK: How Robust is Image Classification Deep Neural Network Watermarking? (Extended Version)cited by 69
  13. 2022Black-box Dataset Ownership Verification via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 65
  14. 2023Diversity-Aware Meta Visual Promptingcited by 58
  15. 2023Prompt Stealing Attacks Against Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 51
  16. 2021Copy, Right? A Testing Framework for Copyright Protection of Deep Learning Modelscited by 46
  17. 2022Dataset Inference for Self-Supervised Modelscited by 36
  18. 2021Cross-modal Adversarial Reprogrammingcited by 34
  19. 2023PromptCARE: Prompt Copyright Protection by Watermark Injection and Verificationcited by 32
  20. 2022Are You Stealing My Model? Sample Correlation for Fingerprinting Deep Neural Networkscited by 21
  21. 2022MetaV: A Meta-Verifier Approach to Task-Agnostic Model Fingerprintingcited by 16
  22. 2021Why Adversarial Reprogramming Works, When It Fails, and How to Tell the Differencecited by 13
  23. 2023Quantifying Privacy Risks of Prompts in Visual Prompt Learningcited by 8
  24. 2014A Survey of Digital Watermarking Techniques and its Applicationscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Prompt Backdoors in Visual Prompt Learning
  2. 2026Answer It or Not? Towards Prompt-Adapted Adversarial Images on Vision Language Models
  3. 2025PromptCOS: Towards Content-only System Prompt Copyright Auditing for LLMs
  4. 2025SWAP: Towards Copyright Auditing of Soft Prompts via Sequential Watermarking
  5. 2026PROVE: Training-Free Prompt Recovery using Verifiable Evidence
  6. 2023Watermarking Vision-Language Pre-trained Models for Multi-modal Embedding as a Service
  7. 2026VPA-Guard: Defending and Benchmarking Image-to-Video Generation Against Visual Prompt Attacks
  8. 2023VPA: Fully Test-Time Visual Prompt Adaptation