Are You Copying My Prompt? Protecting the Copyright of Vision Prompt for VPaaS via Watermark
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Visual Prompt Learning (VPL) differs from traditional fine-tuning methods in reducing significant resource consumption by avoiding updating pre-trained model parameters. Instead, it focuses on learning an input perturbation, a visual prompt, added to downstream task data for making predictions. Since learning generalizable prompts requires expert design and creation, which is technically demanding and time-consuming in the optimization process, developers of Visual Prompts as a Service (VPaaS) have emerged. These developers profit by providing well-crafted prompts to authorized customers. However, a significant drawback is that prompts can be easily copied and redistributed, threatening the intellectual property of VPaaS developers. Hence, there is an urgent need for technology to protect the rights of VPaaS developers. To this end, we present a method named WVPrompt that employs visual prompt watermarking in a black-box way. WVPrompt consists of two parts: prompt watermarking and prompt verification. Specifically, it utilizes a poison-only backdoor attack method to embed a watermark into the prompt and then employs a hypothesis-testing approach for remote verification of prompt ownership. Extensive experiments have been conducted on three well-known benchmark datasets using three popular pre-trained models: RN50, BIT-M, and Instagram. The experimental results demonstrate that WVPrompt is efficient, harmless, and robust to various adversarial operations.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 36 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 May 2024.
Builds on
36 of 51 references.
References · 36
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuningcited by 1,681
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,160
- 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 769
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Modelscited by 725
- 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
- 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
- 2018Turning Your Weakness Into a Strength: Watermarking Deep Neural Networks by Backdooringcited by 357
- 2020Invisible Backdoor Attack with Sample-Specific Triggerscited by 353
24 more
- 2022Exploring Visual Prompts for Adapting Large-Scale Modelscited by 274
- 2022Visual Prompting via Image Inpaintingcited by 250
- 2017Embedding Watermarks into Deep Neural Networkscited by 248
- 2018Adversarial Reprogramming of Neural Networkscited by 116
- 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 116
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Test-time Domain Adaptationcited by 97
- 2022Understanding and Improving Visual Prompting: A Label-Mapping Perspectivecited by 87
- 2022Untargeted Backdoor Watermark: Towards Harmless and Stealthy Dataset Copyright Protectioncited by 86
- 2020Transfer Learning without Knowing: Reprogramming Black-box Machine Learning Models with Scarce Data and Limited Resourcescited by 83
- 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Generative Transfer Learningcited by 75
- 2021A survey of deep neural network watermarking techniquescited by 73
- 2021SoK: How Robust is Image Classification Deep Neural Network Watermarking? (Extended Version)cited by 69
- 2022Black-box Dataset Ownership Verification via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 65
- 2023Diversity-Aware Meta Visual Promptingcited by 58
- 2023Prompt Stealing Attacks Against Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 51
- 2021Copy, Right? A Testing Framework for Copyright Protection of Deep Learning Modelscited by 46
- 2022Dataset Inference for Self-Supervised Modelscited by 36
- 2021Cross-modal Adversarial Reprogrammingcited by 34
- 2023PromptCARE: Prompt Copyright Protection by Watermark Injection and Verificationcited by 32
- 2022Are You Stealing My Model? Sample Correlation for Fingerprinting Deep Neural Networkscited by 21
- 2022MetaV: A Meta-Verifier Approach to Task-Agnostic Model Fingerprintingcited by 16
- 2021Why Adversarial Reprogramming Works, When It Fails, and How to Tell the Differencecited by 13
- 2023Quantifying Privacy Risks of Prompts in Visual Prompt Learningcited by 8
- 2014A Survey of Digital Watermarking Techniques and its Applicationscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Visual Prompting in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 54
- 2024Robust and Minimally Invasive Watermarking for EaaScited by 4
- 2025Vision-Language Model IP Protection via Prompt-based Learningcited by 3
- 2025FlexICL: A Flexible Visual In-context Learning Framework for Elbow and Wrist Ultrasound Segmentationcited by 0
- 2025FlexICL: A Flexible Visual In-context Learning Framework for Elbow and Wrist Ultrasound Segmentation30 Oct 2025
- 2025Vision-Language Model IP Protection via Prompt-based Learning4 Mar 2025
- 2024Robust and Minimally Invasive Watermarking for EaaS23 Oct 2024
- 2024Visual Prompting in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Survey5 Sep 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Prompt Backdoors in Visual Prompt Learning
- 2026Answer It or Not? Towards Prompt-Adapted Adversarial Images on Vision Language Models
- 2025PromptCOS: Towards Content-only System Prompt Copyright Auditing for LLMs
- 2025SWAP: Towards Copyright Auditing of Soft Prompts via Sequential Watermarking
- 2026PROVE: Training-Free Prompt Recovery using Verifiable Evidence
- 2023Watermarking Vision-Language Pre-trained Models for Multi-modal Embedding as a Service
- 2026VPA-Guard: Defending and Benchmarking Image-to-Video Generation Against Visual Prompt Attacks
- 2023VPA: Fully Test-Time Visual Prompt Adaptation