mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SWAP: Towards Copyright Auditing of Soft Prompts via Sequential Watermarking

arXiv 2511.04711 ↗First posted 5 Nov 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale vision-language models, especially CLIP, have demonstrated remarkable performance across diverse downstream tasks. Soft prompts, as carefully crafted modules that efficiently adapt vision-language models to specific tasks, necessitate effective copyright protection. In this paper, we investigate model copyright protection by auditing whether suspicious third-party models incorporate protected soft prompts. While this can be viewed as a special case of model ownership auditing, our analysis shows that existing techniques are ineffective due to prompt learning's unique characteristics. Non-intrusive auditing is inherently prone to false positives when independent models share similar data distributions with victim models. Intrusive approaches also fail: backdoor methods designed for CLIP cannot embed functional triggers, while extending traditional DNN backdoor techniques to prompt learning suffers from harmfulness and ambiguity challenges. We find that these failures in intrusive auditing stem from the same fundamental reason: watermarking operates within the same decision space as the primary task yet pursues opposing objectives. Motivated by these findings, we propose sequential watermarking for soft prompts (SWAP), which implants watermarks into a different and more complex space. SWAP encodes watermarks through a specific order of defender-specified out-of-distribution classes, inspired by the zero-shot prediction capability of CLIP. This watermark, which is embedded in a more complex space, keeps the original prediction label unchanged, making it less opposed to the primary task. We further design a hypothesis-test-guided verification protocol for SWAP and provide a theoretical analysis of when verification works. Extensive experiments on 11 datasets demonstrate SWAP's effectiveness, harmlessness, and robustness against potential attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in MLLM jailbreaks and adversarial robustness, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 52 of its 76 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.

Builds on

52 of 76 references.

Closest ancestors · 2

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023BadCLIP: Trigger-Aware Prompt Learning for Backdoor Attacks on CLIP26 Nov
  2. 2023Watermarking Vision-Language Pre-trained Models for Multi-modal Embedding as a Service10 Nov

Other references · 50

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2021Scaling Up Visual and Vision-Language Representation Learning With Noisy Text Supervisioncited by 3,864
  3. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
  4. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  5. 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
  6. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  7. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  8. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  9. 2017EuroSAT: A Novel Dataset and Deep Learning Benchmark for Land Use and Land Cover Classificationcited by 1,496
  10. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,433
  11. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  12. 2022CoCa: Contrastive Captioners are Image-Text Foundation Modelscited by 1,274
38 more
  1. 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,106
  2. 2017Targeted Backdoor Attacks on Deep Learning Systems Using Data Poisoningcited by 1,055
  3. 2021CLIP-Adapter: Better Vision-Language Models with Feature Adapterscited by 1,026
  4. 2019Learning Robust Global Representations by Penalizing Local Predictive Powercited by 1,013
  5. 2022MaPLe: Multi-modal Prompt Learningcited by 687
  6. 2021LiT: Zero-Shot Transfer with Locked-image text Tuningcited by 577
  7. 2020Invisible Backdoor Attack with Sample-Specific Triggerscited by 353
  8. 2023Self-regulating Prompts: Foundational Model Adaptation without Forgettingcited by 272
  9. 2021Poisoning and Backdooring Contrastive Learningcited by 151
  10. 2021BadEncoder: Backdoor Attacks to Pre-trained Encoders in Self-Supervised Learningcited by 123
  11. 2021Dataset Inference: Ownership Resolution in Machine Learningcited by 116
  12. 2023BadCLIP: Dual-Embedding Guided Backdoor Attack on Multimodal Contrastive Learningcited by 115
  13. 2019[Extended version] Rethinking Deep Neural Network Ownership Verification: Embedding Passports to Defeat Ambiguity Attackscited by 88
  14. 2022Black-box Dataset Ownership Verification via Backdoor Watermarkingcited by 65
  15. 2022Fingerprinting Deep Neural Networks Globally via Universal Adversarial Perturbationscited by 61
  16. 2023Domain Watermark: Effective and Harmless Dataset Copyright Protection is Closed at Handcited by 57
  17. 2021Targeted Attack against Deep Neural Networks via Flipping Limited Weight Bitscited by 49
  18. 2022Data Poisoning Attacks Against Multimodal Encoderscited by 41
  19. 2023CLIP-guided Prototype Modulating for Few-shot Action Recognitioncited by 41
  20. 2024Explanation as a Watermark: Towards Harmless and Multi-bit Model Ownership Verification via Watermarking Feature Attributioncited by 40
  21. 2023Pre-trained Trojan Attacks for Visual Recognitioncited by 39
  22. 2022Dataset Inference for Self-Supervised Modelscited by 36
  23. 2023Progressive Visual Prompt Learning with Contrastive Feature Re-formationcited by 36
  24. 2024SleeperMark: Towards Robust Watermark against Fine-Tuning Text-to-image Diffusion Modelscited by 29
  25. 2022MOVE: Effective and Harmless Ownership Verification via Embedded External Featurescited by 21
  26. 2024Towards Reliable Verification of Unauthorized Data Usage in Personalized Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 20
  27. 2024Advancing Textual Prompt Learning with Anchored Attributescited by 20
  28. 2025Rethinking Data Protection in the (Generative) Artificial Intelligence Eracited by 18
  29. 2023GrOVe: Ownership Verification of Graph Neural Networks using Embeddingscited by 16
  30. 2024SoK: Dataset Copyright Auditing in Machine Learning Systemscited by 15
  31. 2025SoK: Large Language Model Copyright Auditing via Fingerprintingcited by 15
  32. 2022BATT: Backdoor Attack with Transformation-based Triggerscited by 11
  33. 2023Towards Robust Model Watermark via Reducing Parametric Vulnerabilitycited by 10
  34. 2024ReCLIP++: Learn to Rectify the Bias of CLIP for Unsupervised Semantic Segmentationcited by 8
  35. 2025DATABench: Evaluating Dataset Auditing in Deep Learning from an Adversarial Perspectivecited by 8
  36. 2025Towards Backdoor Stealthiness in Model Parameter Spacecited by 7
  37. 2024Learning text-to-video retrieval from image captioningcited by 6
  38. 2025AGATE: Stealthy Black-box Watermarking for Multimodal Model Copyright Protectioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Persistence of Backdoor-based Watermarks for Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Evaluation
  2. 2025PROMPTMINER: Black-Box Prompt Stealing against Text-to-Image Generative Models via Reinforcement Learning and Fuzz Optimization
  3. 2026AGMark: Attention-Guided Dynamic Watermarking for Large Vision-Language Models
  4. 2025Tracking the Copyright of Large Vision-Language Models through Parameter Learning Adversarial Images
  5. 2025Beyond Invisibility: Learning Robust Visible Watermarks for Stronger Copyright Protection
  6. 2024Watermarking Language Models through Language Models
  7. 2021Copy, Right? A Testing Framework for Copyright Protection of Deep Learning Models
  8. 2022Deep Fidelity in DNN Watermarking: A Study of Backdoor Watermarking for Classification Models