mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

VPA: Fully Test-Time Visual Prompt Adaptation

arXiv 2309.15251 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2023cs.CV cs.AIcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Textual prompt tuning has demonstrated significant performance improvements in adapting natural language processing models to a variety of downstream tasks by treating hand-engineered prompts as trainable parameters. Inspired by the success of textual prompting, several studies have investigated the efficacy of visual prompt tuning. In this work, we present Visual Prompt Adaptation (VPA), the first framework that generalizes visual prompting with test-time adaptation. VPA introduces a small number of learnable tokens, enabling fully test-time and storage-efficient adaptation without necessitating source-domain information. We examine our VPA design under diverse adaptation settings, encompassing single-image, batched-image, and pseudo-label adaptation. We evaluate VPA on multiple tasks, including out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization, corruption robustness, and domain adaptation. Experimental results reveal that VPA effectively enhances OOD generalization by 3.3% across various models, surpassing previous test-time approaches. Furthermore, we show that VPA improves corruption robustness by 6.5% compared to strong baselines. Finally, we demonstrate that VPA also boosts domain adaptation performance by relatively 5.2%. Our VPA also exhibits marked effectiveness in improving the robustness of zero-shot recognition for vision-language models.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 69 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2023.

Builds on

52 of 69 references.

References · 52

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  4. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  5. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  6. 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
  7. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  8. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  9. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
  10. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  11. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  12. 2021Learning to Prompt for Vision-Language Modelscited by 2,281
38 more
  1. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  2. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,234
  3. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  4. 2020The Many Faces of Robustness: A Critical Analysis of Out-of-Distribution Generalizationcited by 1,850
  5. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
  6. 2022Conditional Prompt Learning for Vision-Language Modelscited by 1,433
  7. 2019Natural Adversarial Examplescited by 1,408
  8. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,375
  9. 2018Moment Matching for Multi-Source Domain Adaptationcited by 1,331
  10. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,033
  11. 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 903
  12. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 901
  13. 2020Do We Really Need to Access the Source Data? Source Hypothesis Transfer for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 848
  14. 2021Robust fine-tuning of zero-shot modelscited by 797
  15. 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 739
  16. 2017VisDA: The Visual Domain Adaptation Challengecited by 435
  17. 2020Improving robustness against common corruptions by covariate shift adaptationcited by 431
  18. 2022Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Zero-Shot Generalization in Vision-Language Modelscited by 382
  19. 2021MEMO: Test Time Robustness via Adaptation and Augmentationcited by 377
  20. 2022Exploring Visual Prompts for Adapting Large-Scale Modelscited by 274
  21. 2022Contrastive Test-Time Adaptationcited by 261
  22. 2021PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classificationcited by 238
  23. 2020Evaluating Prediction-Time Batch Normalization for Robustness under Covariate Shiftcited by 236
  24. 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
  25. 2020Universal Source-Free Domain Adaptationcited by 220
  26. 2018Reducing Network Agnostophobiacited by 165
  27. 2015Ask Me Anything: Dynamic Memory Networks for Natural Language Processingcited by 117
  28. 2018Adversarial Reprogramming of Neural Networkscited by 116
  29. 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Conjugate Pseudo-labelscited by 98
  30. 2022Decorate the Newcomers: Visual Domain Prompt for Continual Test Time Adaptationcited by 98
  31. 2022Visual Prompt Tuning for Test-time Domain Adaptationcited by 97
  32. 2020Towards Robust LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Driving: General Black-box Adversarial Sensor Attack and Countermeasurescited by 95
  33. 2022On Adversarial Robustness of Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 90
  34. 2020Domain Adaptation without Source Datacited by 88
  35. 2022Benchmarking Robustness of 3D Point Cloud Recognition Against Common Corruptionscited by 80
  36. 2019Test-Time Training with Self-Supervision for Generalization under Distribution Shiftscited by 59
  37. 2021Source-Free Adaptation to Measurement Shift via Bottom-Up Feature Restorationcited by 50
  38. 2022Robustifying Vision Transformer without Retraining from Scratch by Test-Time Class-Conditional Feature Alignmentcited by 27

50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 5; 2025: 6.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025MINT: Memory-Infused Prompt Tuning at Test-time for CLIP
  2. 2025Revisit Visual Prompt Tuning: The Expressiveness of Prompt Experts
  3. 2023Align Your Prompts: Test-Time Prompting with Distribution Alignment for Zero-Shot Generalization
  4. 2026USE: A Unified Self-Ensembling Framework for Test-Time Prompt Tuning
  5. 2023STA-VPT: SpatioTemporally Aligned Visual Prompt Tuning
  6. 2025A Closer Look at Conditional Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026Towards Fine-Grained Robustness: Attention-Guided Test-Time Prompt Tuning for Vision-Language Models
  8. 2024Exploring the Transferability of Visual Prompting for Multimodal Large Language Models