CWF: Consolidating Weak Features in High-quality Mesh Simplification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In mesh simplification, common requirements like accuracy, triangle quality, and feature alignment are often considered as a trade-off. Existing algorithms concentrate on just one or a few specific aspects of these requirements. For example, the well-known Quadric Error Metrics (QEM) approach prioritizes accuracy and can preserve strong feature lines/points as well but falls short in ensuring high triangle quality and may degrade weak features that are not as distinctive as strong ones. In this paper, we propose a smooth functional that simultaneously considers all of these requirements. The functional comprises a normal anisotropy term and a Centroidal Voronoi Tessellation (CVT) energy term, with the variables being a set of movable points lying on the surface. The former inherits the spirit of QEM but operates in a continuous setting, while the latter encourages even point distribution, allowing various surface metrics. We further introduce a decaying weight to automatically balance the two terms. We selected 100 CAD models from the ABC dataset, along with 21 organic models, to compare the existing mesh simplification algorithms with ours. Experimental results reveal an important observation: the introduction of a decaying weight effectively reduces the conflict between the two terms and enables the alignment of weak features. This distinctive feature sets our approach apart from most existing mesh simplification methods and demonstrates significant potential in shape understanding.
Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Apr 2024.
Builds on
9 of 57 references.
References · 9
- 2018ABC: A Big CAD Model Dataset For Geometric Deep Learningcited by 341
- 2021Neural Marching Cubescited by 50
- 2021Coverage Axis: Inner Point Selection for 3D Shape Skeletonizationcited by 22
- 2022Computing Medial Axis Transform with Feature Preservation via Restricted Power Diagramcited by 15
- 2024Coverage Axis++: Efficient Inner Point Selection for 3D Shape Skeletonizationcited by 10
- 2019Top-Down Shape Abstraction Based on Greedy Pole Selectioncited by 7
- 2023Surface Simplification using Intrinsic Error Metricscited by 4
- 2024MATTopo: Topology-preserving Medial Axis Transform with Restricted Power Diagramcited by 4
- 2019VoroCrust: Voronoi Meshing Without Clippingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.
8 papers.
- 2024TetSphere Splatting: Representing High-Quality Geometry with Lagrangian Volumetric Meshescited by 21
- 2025PDT: Point Distribution Transformation with Diffusion Modelscited by 8
- 2025MeshMosaic: Scaling Artist Mesh Generation via Local-to-Global Assemblycited by 8
- 2026Strips as Tokens: Artist Mesh Generation with Native UV Segmentationcited by 3
- 2026Autoregressive B-Rep Shape Generation with Parametric Surfacescited by 2
- 2024NASM: Neural Anisotropic Surface Meshingcited by 1
- 2025Feature-Preserving Mesh Decimation for Normal Integrationcited by 1
- 2026SubdivAR: Autoregressive Next-Scale Prediction for Neural Mesh Subdivisioncited by 1
- 2026Autoregressive B-Rep Shape Generation with Parametric Surfaces19 Jul 2026
- 2026SubdivAR: Autoregressive Next-Scale Prediction for Neural Mesh Subdivision25 Jun 2026
- 2026Strips as Tokens: Artist Mesh Generation with Native UV Segmentation10 Apr 2026
- 2025MeshMosaic: Scaling Artist Mesh Generation via Local-to-Global Assembly24 Sep 2025
- 2025PDT: Point Distribution Transformation with Diffusion Models25 Jul 2025
- 2025Feature-Preserving Mesh Decimation for Normal Integration1 Apr 2025
- 2024NASM: Neural Anisotropic Surface Meshing30 Oct 2024
- 2024TetSphere Splatting: Representing High-Quality Geometry with Lagrangian Volumetric Meshes30 May 2024