FairSSD: Understanding Bias in Synthetic Speech Detectors
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Methods that can generate synthetic speech which is perceptually indistinguishable from speech recorded by a human speaker, are easily available. Several incidents report misuse of synthetic speech generated from these methods to commit fraud. To counter such misuse, many methods have been proposed to detect synthetic speech. Some of these detectors are more interpretable, can generalize to detect synthetic speech in the wild and are robust to noise. However, limited work has been done on understanding bias in these detectors. In this work, we examine bias in existing synthetic speech detectors to determine if they will unfairly target a particular gender, age and accent group. We also inspect whether these detectors will have a higher misclassification rate for bona fide speech from speech-impaired speakers w.r.t fluent speakers. Extensive experiments on 6 existing synthetic speech detectors using more than 0.9 million speech signals demonstrate that most detectors are gender, age and accent biased, and future work is needed to ensure fairness. To support future research, we release our evaluation dataset, models used in our study and source code at https://gitlab.com/viper-purdue/fairssd.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 79 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2024.
Builds on
42 of 79 references.
References · 42
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
- 2021Diffusion Models Beat GANs on Image Synthesiscited by 8,255
- 2020wav2vec 2.0: A Framework for Self-Supervised Learning of Speech Representationscited by 3,905
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
- 2021Efficient Training of Audio Transformers with Patchoutcited by 226
- 2021AASIST: Audio Anti-Spoofing using Integrated Spectro-Temporal Graph Attention Networkscited by 180
- 2019ASVspoof 2019: Future Horizons in Spoofed and Fake Audio Detectioncited by 178
- 2021SSAST: Self-Supervised Audio Spectrogram Transformercited by 169
- 2022ProDiff: Progressive Fast Diffusion Model For High-Quality Text-to-Speechcited by 149
- 2022Does Audio Deepfake Detection Generalize?cited by 135
30 more
- 2022ASVspoof 2021: Towards Spoofed and Deepfake Speech Detection in the Wildcited by 121
- 2022Automatic speaker verification spoofing and deepfake detection using wav2vec 2.0 and data augmentationcited by 117
- 2021Deepfakes Generation and Detection: State-of-the-art, open challenges, countermeasures, and way forwardcited by 82
- 2021Towards Measuring Fairness in AI: the Casual Conversations Datasetcited by 80
- 2021ASVspoof 2019: spoofing countermeasures for the detection of synthesized, converted and replayed speechcited by 58
- 2021SEP-28k: A Dataset for Stuttering Event Detection From Podcasts With People Who Stuttercited by 52
- 2022Masked Spectrogram Modeling using Masked Autoencoders for Learning General-purpose Audio Representationcited by 52
- 2021Quantifying Bias in Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 50
- 2022The PartialSpoof Database and Countermeasures for the Detection of Short Fake Speech Segments Embedded in an Utterancecited by 47
- 2023AI-Synthesized Voice Detection Using Neural Vocoder Artifactscited by 41
- 2023Improving Fairness in Deepfake Detectioncited by 40
- 2020Replay and Synthetic Speech Detection with Res2net Architecturecited by 39
- 2021Towards End-to-End Synthetic Speech Detectioncited by 38
- 2021An Examination of Fairness of AI Models for Deepfake Detectioncited by 35
- 2019Deep Residual Neural Networks for Audio Spoofing Detectioncited by 33
- 2022GBDF: Gender Balanced DeepFake Dataset Towards Fair DeepFake Detectioncited by 32
- 2021Raw Differentiable Architecture Search for Speech Deepfake and Spoofing Detectioncited by 22
- 2022Bias in Automated Speaker Recognitioncited by 20
- 2022Hey ASR System! Why Aren't You More Inclusive? Automatic Speech Recognition Systems' Bias and Proposed Bias Mitigation Techniques. A Literature Reviewcited by 19
- 2021Multi-Task Learning in Utterance-Level and Segmental-Level Spoof Detectioncited by 16
- 2022Fairness Evaluation in Deepfake Detection Models using Metamorphic Testingcited by 16
- 2023UnitSpeech: Speaker-adaptive Speech Synthesis with Untranscribed Datacited by 15
- 2020An explainability study of the constant Q cepstral coefficient spoofing countermeasure for automatic speaker verificationcited by 13
- 2021Explaining deep learning models for spoofing and deepfake detection with SHapley Additive exPlanationscited by 13
- 2022Fairness in Face Presentation Attack Detectioncited by 13
- 2022The Influence of Dataset Partitioning on Dysfluency Detection Systemscited by 9
- 2019Detecting Spoofing Attacks Using VGG and SincNet: BUT-Omilia Submission to ASVspoof 2019 Challengecited by 6
- 2023DSVAE: Interpretable Disentangled Representation for Synthetic Speech Detectioncited by 6
- 2021Algorithmic Fairness in Face Morphing Attack Detectioncited by 5
- 2024Compression Robust Synthetic Speech Detection Using Patched Spectrogram Transformercited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 4.
9 papers.
- 2024Leveraging Mixture of Experts for Improved Speech Deepfake Detectioncited by 15
- 2025VoiceBBQ: Investigating Effect of Content and Acoustics in Social Bias of Spoken Language Modelcited by 6
- 2026Gender Fairness in Audio Deepfake Detection: Performance and Disparity Analysiscited by 3
- 2025Acoustic-based Gender Differentiation in Speech-aware Language Modelscited by 1
- 2026Towards Trustworthy Audio Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Framework for Diagnosing and Mitigating Gender Biascited by 1
- 2026Ethical and Technical Limits of Deepfake Speech Datasetscited by 1
- 2025HISPASpoof: A New Dataset For Spanish Speech Forensicscited by 0
- 2025Can Current Detectors Catch Face-to-Voice Deepfake Attacks?cited by 0
- 2026What You Train Is What You Get: Gender Bias, Training Composition, and Post-Hoc Mitigation in Audio Deepfake Detectioncited by 0
- 2026What You Train Is What You Get: Gender Bias, Training Composition, and Post-Hoc Mitigation in Audio Deepfake Detection10 Jul 2026
- 2026Ethical and Technical Limits of Deepfake Speech Datasets9 Jun 2026
- 2026Towards Trustworthy Audio Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Framework for Diagnosing and Mitigating Gender Bias9 May 2026
- 2026Gender Fairness in Audio Deepfake Detection: Performance and Disparity Analysis9 Mar 2026
- 2025Can Current Detectors Catch Face-to-Voice Deepfake Attacks?23 Oct 2025
- 2025Acoustic-based Gender Differentiation in Speech-aware Language Models25 Sep 2025
- 2025VoiceBBQ: Investigating Effect of Content and Acoustics in Social Bias of Spoken Language Model25 Sep 2025
- 2025HISPASpoof: A New Dataset For Spanish Speech Forensics11 Sep 2025
- 2024Leveraging Mixture of Experts for Improved Speech Deepfake Detection24 Sep 2024