mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Fairness Evaluation in Deepfake Detection Models using Metamorphic Testing

arXiv 2203.06825 ↗First posted 14 Mar 2022cs.CV cs.SEcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fairness of deepfake detectors in the presence of anomalies are not well investigated, especially if those anomalies are more prominent in either male or female subjects. The primary motivation for this work is to evaluate how deepfake detection model behaves under such anomalies. However, due to the black-box nature of deep learning (DL) and artificial intelligence (AI) systems, it is hard to predict the performance of a model when the input data is modified. Crucially, if this defect is not addressed properly, it will adversely affect the fairness of the model and result in discrimination of certain sub-population unintentionally. Therefore, the objective of this work is to adopt metamorphic testing to examine the reliability of the selected deepfake detection model, and how the transformation of input variation places influence on the output. We have chosen MesoInception-4, a state-of-the-art deepfake detection model, as the target model and makeup as the anomalies. Makeups are applied through utilizing the Dlib library to obtain the 68 facial landmarks prior to filling in the RGB values. Metamorphic relations are derived based on the notion that realistic perturbations of the input images, such as makeup, involving eyeliners, eyeshadows, blushes, and lipsticks (which are common cosmetic appearance) applied to male and female images, should not alter the output of the model by a huge margin. Furthermore, we narrow down the scope to focus on revealing potential gender biases in DL and AI systems. Specifically, we are interested to examine whether MesoInception-4 model produces unfair decisions, which should be considered as a consequence of robustness issues. The findings from our work have the potential to pave the way for new research directions in the quality assurance and fairness in DL and AI systems.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Mar 2022.

Builds on

11 of 16 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  2. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,241
  3. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,332
  4. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  5. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,101
  6. 2019Face X-ray for More General Face Forgery Detectioncited by 470
  7. 2018MesoNet: a Compact Facial Video Forgery Detection Networkcited by 409
  8. 2020Adversarial Threats to DeepFake Detection: A Practical Perspectivecited by 48
  9. 2021An Examination of Fairness of AI Models for Deepfake Detectioncited by 35
  10. 2019Swapped Face Detection using Deep Learning and Subjective Assessmentcited by 14
  11. 2021Robustness Evaluation of Stacked Generative Adversarial Networks using Metamorphic Testingcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 5; 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

16 papers.

Sort: