mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Algorithmic Fairness in Face Morphing Attack Detection

arXiv 2111.12115 ↗First posted 23 Nov 2021cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Face morphing attacks can compromise Face Recognition System (FRS) by exploiting their vulnerability. Face Morphing Attack Detection (MAD) techniques have been developed in recent past to deter such attacks and mitigate risks from morphing attacks. MAD algorithms, as any other algorithms should treat the images of subjects from different ethnic origins in an equal manner and provide non-discriminatory results. While the promising MAD algorithms are tested for robustness, there is no study comprehensively bench-marking their behaviour against various ethnicities. In this paper, we study and present a comprehensive analysis of algorithmic fairness of the existing Single image-based Morph Attack Detection (S-MAD) algorithms. We attempt to better understand the influence of ethnic bias on MAD algorithms and to this extent, we study the performance of MAD algorithms on a newly created dataset consisting of four different ethnic groups. With Extensive experiments using six different S-MAD techniques, we first present benchmark of detection performance and then measure the quantitative value of the algorithmic fairness for each of them using Fairness Discrepancy Rate (FDR). The results indicate the lack of fairness on all six different S-MAD methods when trained and tested on different ethnic groups suggesting the need for reliable MAD approaches to mitigate the algorithmic bias.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Nov 2021.

Builds on

21 of 44 references.

References · 21

  1. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  2. 2021A Comprehensive Study on Face Recognition Biases Beyond Demographicscited by 86
  3. 2020Face Recognition: Too Bias, or Not Too Bias?cited by 82
  4. 2020Face Morphing Attack Generation & Detection: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 63
  5. 2020Deep Face Representations for Differential Morphing Attack Detectioncited by 46
  6. 2020Can GAN Generated Morphs Threaten Face Recognition Systems Equally as Landmark Based Morphs? -- Vulnerability and Detectioncited by 46
  7. 2020Fairness in Biometrics: a figure of merit to assess biometric verification systemscited by 41
  8. 2020Morphing Attack Detection -- Database, Evaluation Platform and Benchmarkingcited by 38
  9. 2021PW-MAD: Pixel-wise Supervision for Generalized Face Morphing Attack Detectioncited by 29
  10. 2019Face morphing detection in the presence of printing/scanning and heterogeneous image sourcescited by 22
  11. 2021ReGenMorph: Visibly Realistic GAN Generated Face Morphing Attacks by Attack Re-generationcited by 21
  12. 2019Robust Morph-Detection at Automated Border Control Gate using Deep Decomposed 3D Shape and Diffuse Reflectancecited by 15
9 more
  1. 2020Mutual Information Maximization on Disentangled Representations for Differential Morph Detectioncited by 14
  2. 2021Attention Aware Wavelet-based Detection of Morphed Face Imagescited by 14
  3. 2020Differential Morphed Face Detection Using Deep Siamese Networkscited by 12
  4. 2021Conditional Identity Disentanglement for Differential Face Morph Detectioncited by 12
  5. 2018Reflection Analysis for Face Morphing Attack Detectioncited by 11
  6. 2020On the Influence of Ageing on Face Morph Attacks: Vulnerability and Detectioncited by 10
  7. 2020MIPGAN -- Generating Strong and High Quality Morphing Attacks Using Identity Prior Driven GANcited by 9
  8. 2020Quantifying the Extent to Which Race and Gender Features Determine Identity in Commercial Face Recognition Algorithmscited by 5
  9. 2018Preliminary Studies on a Large Face Databasecited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

5 papers.