mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Safe Reinforcement Learning on the Constraint Manifold: Theory and Applications

arXiv 2404.09080 ↗First posted 13 Apr 2024cs.RO cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Integrating learning-based techniques, especially reinforcement learning, into robotics is promising for solving complex problems in unstructured environments. However, most existing approaches are trained in well-tuned simulators and subsequently deployed on real robots without online fine-tuning. In this setting, extensive engineering is required to mitigate the sim-to-real gap, which can be challenging for complex systems. Instead, learning with real-world interaction data offers a promising alternative: it not only eliminates the need for a fine-tuned simulator but also applies to a broader range of tasks where accurate modeling is unfeasible. One major problem for on-robot reinforcement learning is ensuring safety, as uncontrolled exploration can cause catastrophic damage to the robot or the environment. Indeed, safety specifications, often represented as constraints, can be complex and non-linear, making safety challenging to guarantee in learning systems. In this paper, we show how we can impose complex safety constraints on learning-based robotics systems in a principled manner, both from theoretical and practical points of view. Our approach is based on the concept of the Constraint Manifold, representing the set of safe robot configurations. Exploiting differential geometry techniques, i.e., the tangent space, we can construct a safe action space, allowing learning agents to sample arbitrary actions while ensuring safety. We demonstrate the method's effectiveness in a real-world Robot Air Hockey task, showing that our method can handle high-dimensional tasks with complex constraints. Videos of the real robot experiments are available on the project website (https://puzeliu.github.io/TRO-ATACOM).

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 62 of its 108 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Apr 2024.

Builds on

62 of 108 references.

References · 62

  1. 2018Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applicationscited by 1,179
  2. 2017Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 928
  3. 2017Safe Reinforcement Learning via Shieldingcited by 427
  4. 2018Reward Constrained Policy Optimizationcited by 397
  5. 2017Safe Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Stability Guaranteescited by 347
  6. 2021Safe Learning in Robotics: From Learning-Based Control to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 337
  7. 2019Control Barrier Functions: Theory and Applicationscited by 332
  8. 2020Responsive Safety in Reinforcement Learning by PID Lagrangian Methodscited by 302
  9. 2018A Lyapunov-based Approach to Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 278
  10. 2019End-to-End Safe Reinforcement Learning through Barrier Functions for Safety-Critical Continuous Control Taskscited by 256
  11. 2018Safe Exploration in Continuous Action Spacescited by 237
  12. 2021How to Train Your Robot with Deep Reinforcement Learning; Lessons We've Learnedcited by 201
38 more
  1. 2017OSQP: An Operator Splitting Solver for Quadratic Programscited by 156
  2. 2017A General Safety Framework for Learning-Based Control in Uncertain Robotic Systemscited by 150
  3. 2022Safe Control with Learned Certificates: A Survey of Neural Lyapunov, Barrier, and Contraction methodscited by 148
  4. 2019Lyapunov-based Safe Policy Optimization for Continuous Controlcited by 140
  5. 2016Bayesian Optimization with Safety Constraints: Safe and Automatic Parameter Tuning in Roboticscited by 134
  6. 2020Provably Efficient Safe Exploration via Primal-Dual Policy Optimizationcited by 131
  7. 2019IPO: Interior-point Policy Optimization under Constraintscited by 119
  8. 2018Learning-based Model Predictive Control for Safe Explorationcited by 116
  9. 2023Robot Parkour Learningcited by 115
  10. 2023ANYmal Parkour: Learning Agile Navigation for Quadrupedal Robotscited by 105
  11. 2022Visual Dexterity: In-Hand Reorientation of Novel and Complex Object Shapescited by 92
  12. 2020Learning Control Barrier Functions from Expert Demonstrationscited by 88
  13. 2023Reaching the Limit in Autonomous Racing: Optimal Control versus Reinforcement Learningcited by 72
  14. 2019Learning for Safety-Critical Control with Control Barrier Functionscited by 66
  15. 2017OptLayer - Practical Constrained Optimization for Deep Reinforcement Learning in the Real Worldcited by 64
  16. 2024Safe Offline Reinforcement Learning with Feasibility-Guided Diffusion Modelcited by 62
  17. 2019Convergent Policy Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 55
  18. 2022Enforcing Hard Constraints with Soft Barriers: Safe Reinforcement Learning in Unknown Stochastic Environmentscited by 54
  19. 2021Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Advantage-Based Interventioncited by 45
  20. 2020Cautious Reinforcement Learning with Logical Constraintscited by 44
  21. 2021Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Robust Control Barrier Functionscited by 44
  22. 2024A Survey of Constraint Formulations in Safe Reinforcement Learningcited by 42
  23. 2022Towards Safe Reinforcement Learning via Constraining Conditional Value-at-Riskcited by 40
  24. 2014Safe Exploration of State and Action Spaces in Reinforcement Learningcited by 37
  25. 2020SAMBA: Safe Model-Based & Active Reinforcement Learningcited by 28
  26. 2020Reachability-based Trajectory Safeguard (RTS): A Safe and Fast Reinforcement Learning Safety Layer for Continuous Controlcited by 28
  27. 2022Safe Control Under Input Limits with Neural Control Barrier Functionscited by 27
  28. 2022Provably Safe Reinforcement Learning via Action Projection using Reachability Analysis and Polynomial Zonotopescited by 23
  29. 2022Safe Reinforcement Learning Using Black-Box Reachability Analysiscited by 22
  30. 2021TERP: Reliable Planning in Uneven Outdoor Environments using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 19
  31. 2019An Efficient Reachability-Based Framework for Provably Safe Autonomous Navigation in Unknown Environmentscited by 18
  32. 2021Safe Reinforcement Learning with Chance-constrained Model Predictive Controlcited by 18
  33. 2021Policy Search for Model Predictive Control with Application to Agile Drone Flightcited by 17
  34. 2022GoSafeOpt: Scalable Safe Exploration for Global Optimization of Dynamical Systemscited by 17
  35. 2022Regularized Deep Signed Distance Fields for Reactive Motion Generationcited by 16
  36. 2022Provably Safe Deep Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Manipulation in Human Environmentscited by 16
  37. 2015Safe Policy Search for Lifelong Reinforcement Learning with Sublinear Regretcited by 15
  38. 2020Robot Learning with Crash Constraintscited by 15

50 most cited of 62 All 62 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 6; 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

12 papers.