mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ContextGPT: Infusing LLMs Knowledge into Neuro-Symbolic Activity Recognition Models

arXiv 2403.06586 ↗First posted 11 Mar 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Context-aware Human Activity Recognition (HAR) is a hot research area in mobile computing, and the most effective solutions in the literature are based on supervised deep learning models. However, the actual deployment of these systems is limited by the scarcity of labeled data that is required for training. Neuro-Symbolic AI (NeSy) provides an interesting research direction to mitigate this issue, by infusing common-sense knowledge about human activities and the contexts in which they can be performed into HAR deep learning classifiers. Existing NeSy methods for context-aware HAR rely on knowledge encoded in logic-based models (e.g., ontologies) whose design, implementation, and maintenance to capture new activities and contexts require significant human engineering efforts, technical knowledge, and domain expertise. Recent works show that pre-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) effectively encode common-sense knowledge about human activities. In this work, we propose ContextGPT: a novel prompt engineering approach to retrieve from LLMs common-sense knowledge about the relationship between human activities and the context in which they are performed. Unlike ontologies, ContextGPT requires limited human effort and expertise. An extensive evaluation carried out on two public datasets shows how a NeSy model obtained by infusing common-sense knowledge from ContextGPT is effective in data scarcity scenarios, leading to similar (and sometimes better) recognition rates than logic-based approaches with a fraction of the effort.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2024.

Builds on

21 of 57 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2017Deep Learning for Sensor-based Activity Recognition: A Surveycited by 133
  6. 2020Deep Learning for Sensor-based Human Activity Recognition: Overview, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 125
  7. 2022Assessing the State of Self-Supervised Human Activity Recognition using Wearablescited by 63
  8. 2021Incorporating Domain Knowledge into Deep Neural Networkscited by 56
  9. 2021Neuro-Symbolic Artificial Intelligence: Current Trendscited by 54
  10. 2024HARGPT: Are LLMs Zero-Shot Human Activity Recognizers?cited by 52
  11. 2019Cross-Subject Transfer Learning in Human Activity Recognition Systems using Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 35
  12. 2020Text Recognition in the Wild: A Surveycited by 29
9 more
  1. 2023TENT: Connect Language Models with IoT Sensors for Zero-Shot Activity Recognitioncited by 25
  2. 2019Knowledge Infused Learning (K-IL): Towards Deep Incorporation of Knowledge in Deep Learningcited by 19
  3. 2023Generating Virtual On-body Accelerometer Data from Virtual Textual Descriptions for Human Activity Recognitioncited by 18
  4. 2021Explainable Activity Recognition for Smart Home Systemscited by 14
  5. 2024Transfer Learning in Human Activity Recognition: A Surveycited by 14
  6. 2023GG-LLM: Geometrically Grounding Large Language Models for Zero-shot Human Activity Forecasting in Human-Aware Task Planningcited by 13
  7. 2023Unsupervised Human Activity Recognition through Two-stage Prompting with ChatGPTcited by 11
  8. 2019Context-driven Active and Incremental Activity Recognitioncited by 6
  9. 2023Toward Pioneering Sensors and Features Using Large Language Models in Human Activity Recognitioncited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.