mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Unsupervised Human Activity Recognition through Two-stage Prompting with ChatGPT

arXiv 2306.02140 ↗First posted 3 Jun 2023cs.HC cs.CLcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Wearable sensor devices, which offer the advantage of recording daily objects used by a person while performing an activity, enable the feasibility of unsupervised Human Activity Recognition (HAR). Unfortunately, previous unsupervised approaches using the usage sequence of objects usually require a proper description of activities manually prepared by humans. Instead, we leverage the knowledge embedded in a Large Language Model (LLM) of ChatGPT. Because the sequence of objects robustly characterizes the activity identity, it is possible that ChatGPT already learned the association between activities and objects from existing contexts. However, previous prompt engineering for ChatGPT exhibits limited generalization ability when dealing with a list of words (i.e., sequence of objects) due to the similar weighting assigned to each word in the list. In this study, we propose a two-stage prompt engineering, which first guides ChatGPT to generate activity descriptions associated with objects while emphasizing important objects for distinguishing similar activities; then outputs activity classes and explanations for enhancing the contexts that are helpful for HAR. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that utilizes ChatGPT to recognize activities using objects in an unsupervised manner. We conducted our approach on three datasets and demonstrated the state-of-the-art performance.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jun 2023.

Builds on

4 of 22 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  3. 2021Pre-train, Prompt, and Predict: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Methods in Natural Language Processingcited by 2,222
  4. 2021Generated Knowledge Prompting for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 213

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

11 papers.