Exploring Failure Cases in Multimodal Reasoning About Physical Dynamics
On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we present an exploration of LLMs' abilities to problem solve with physical reasoning in situated environments. We construct a simple simulated environment and demonstrate examples of where, in a zero-shot setting, both text and multimodal LLMs display atomic world knowledge about various objects but fail to compose this knowledge in correct solutions for an object manipulation and placement task. We also use BLIP, a vision-language model trained with more sophisticated cross-modal attention, to identify cases relevant to object physical properties that that model fails to ground. Finally, we present a procedure for discovering the relevant properties of objects in the environment and propose a method to distill this knowledge back into the LLM.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 13 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Feb 2024.
Builds on
13 of 36 references.
References · 13
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,324
- 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,869
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
- 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,071
- 2023Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?cited by 488
- 2023How is ChatGPT's behavior changing over time?cited by 270
- 2022Talking About Large Language Modelscited by 175
- 2023RLCD: Reinforcement Learning from Contrastive Distillation for Language Model Alignmentcited by 43
- 2023An Independent Evaluation of ChatGPT on Mathematical Word Problems (MWP)cited by 31
- 2023Limits for Learning with Language Modelscited by 17
- 2023Generative AI vs. AGI: The Cognitive Strengths and Weaknesses of Modern LLMscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025UP-VLA: A Unified Understanding and Prediction Model for Embodied Agentcited by 102
- 2026Large Language Model Reasoning Failurescited by 21
- 2024Physics Context Builders: A Modular Framework for Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Modelscited by 10
- 2025Teaching Physical Awareness to LLMs through Soundscited by 4
- 2024Computational Thought Experiments for a More Rigorous Philosophy and Science of the Mindcited by 0
- 2026Large Language Model Reasoning Failures5 Feb 2026
- 2025Teaching Physical Awareness to LLMs through Sounds10 Jun 2025
- 2025UP-VLA: A Unified Understanding and Prediction Model for Embodied Agent31 Jan 2025
- 2024Physics Context Builders: A Modular Framework for Physical Reasoning in Vision-Language Models11 Dec 2024
- 2024Computational Thought Experiments for a More Rigorous Philosophy and Science of the Mind14 May 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025InPhyRe Discovers: Large Multimodal Models Struggle in Inductive Physical Reasoning
- 2026PhysMent: An Interactive Approach For LLM Reasoning In Physics Problems
- 2026Integrating Simulation and Chain-of-thought Reasoning in Multimodal-Language Models For Physical Reasoning
- 2024A little less conversation, a little more action, please: Investigating the physical common-sense of LLMs in a 3D embodied environment
- 2026PhysMem: Scaling Test-Time Memory for Embodied Physical Reasoning
- 2025Perception, Reason, Think, and Plan: A Survey on Large Multimodal Reasoning Models
- 2026BilliardPhys-Bench: Benchmarking Physical Reasoning and Visual Dynamics of Multimodal LLMs
- 2025Physically Ground Commonsense Knowledge for Articulated Object Manipulation with Analytic Concepts