mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Physically Ground Commonsense Knowledge for Articulated Object Manipulation with Analytic Concepts

arXiv 2503.23348 ↗First posted 30 Mar 2025cs.RO cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We humans rely on a wide range of commonsense knowledge to interact with an extensive number and categories of objects in the physical world. Likewise, such commonsense knowledge is also crucial for robots to successfully develop generalized object manipulation skills. While recent advancements in Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have showcased their impressive capabilities in acquiring commonsense knowledge and conducting commonsense reasoning, effectively grounding this semantic-level knowledge produced by MLLMs to the physical world to thoroughly guide robots in generalized articulated object manipulation remains a challenge that has not been sufficiently addressed. To this end, we introduce analytic concepts, procedurally defined upon mathematical symbolism that can be directly computed and simulated by machines. By leveraging the analytic concepts as a bridge between the semantic-level knowledge inferred by MLLMs and the physical world where real robots operate, we can figure out the knowledge of object structure and functionality with physics-informed representations, and then use the physically grounded knowledge to instruct robot control policies for generalized and accurate articulated object manipulation. Extensive experiments in both real world and simulation demonstrate the superiority of our approach.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 34 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Mar 2025.

Builds on

34 of 46 references.

References · 34

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  4. 2023Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 7,792
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  6. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,467
  7. 2023Grounding DINO: Marrying DINO with Grounded Pre-Training for Open-Set Object Detectioncited by 3,274
  8. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
  9. 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
  10. 2020Point Transformercited by 1,462
  11. 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,427
  12. 2024Grounded SAM: Assembling Open-World Models for Diverse Visual Taskscited by 914
22 more
  1. 2023LLaMA-Adapter: Efficient Fine-tuning of Language Models with Zero-init Attentioncited by 776
  2. 2023VoxPoser: Composable 3D Value Maps for Robotic Manipulation with Language Modelscited by 733
  3. 2022R3M: A Universal Visual Representation for Robot Manipulationcited by 678
  4. 2020SAPIEN: A SimulAted Part-based Interactive ENvironmentcited by 584
  5. 2024ReKep: Spatio-Temporal Reasoning of Relational Keypoint Constraints for Robotic Manipulationcited by 305
  6. 2023SPHINX: The Joint Mixing of Weights, Tasks, and Visual Embeddings for Multi-modal Large Language Modelscited by 283
  7. 2024A Survey on Vision-Language-Action Models for Embodied AIcited by 274
  8. 2023Where are we in the search for an Artificial Visual Cortex for Embodied Intelligence?cited by 215
  9. 2021Where2Act: From Pixels to Actions for Articulated 3D Objectscited by 179
  10. 2023Language-Driven Representation Learning for Roboticscited by 163
  11. 2023ManipLLM: Embodied Multimodal Large Language Model for Object-Centric Robotic Manipulationcited by 157
  12. 2022GAPartNet: Cross-Category Domain-Generalizable Object Perception and Manipulation via Generalizable and Actionable Partscited by 135
  13. 2023Learning to Act without Actionscited by 116
  14. 2025OmniManip: Towards General Robotic Manipulation via Object-Centric Interaction Primitives as Spatial Constraintscited by 58
  15. 2024AffordanceLLM: Grounding Affordance from Vision Language Modelscited by 55
  16. 2025SoFar: Language-Grounded Orientation Bridges Spatial Reasoning and Object Manipulationcited by 46
  17. 2023GraspGPT: Leveraging Semantic Knowledge from a Large Language Model for Task-Oriented Graspingcited by 40
  18. 2023Where2Explore: Few-shot Affordance Learning for Unseen Novel Categories of Articulated Objectscited by 33
  19. 2024A3VLM: Actionable Articulation-Aware Vision Language Modelcited by 33
  20. 2024Case-Based or Rule-Based: How Do Transformers Do the Math?cited by 26
  21. 2024ManipVQA: Injecting Robotic Affordance and Physically Grounded Information into Multi-Modal Large Language Modelscited by 25
  22. 2024A Survey of Robotic Language Grounding: Tradeoffs between Symbols and Embeddingscited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024PhyGrasp: Generalizing Robotic Grasping with Physics-informed Large Multimodal Models
  2. 2023Physically Grounded Vision-Language Models for Robotic Manipulation
  3. 2026RoboHarn-Evo: Evolving Hierarchical Physical Knowledge for Self-Improving Robotic Manipulation
  4. 2026ManipulationNet: An Infrastructure for Benchmarking Real-World Robot Manipulation with Physical Skill Challenges and Embodied Multimodal Reasoning
  5. 2023Surfer: Progressive Reasoning with World Models for Robotic Manipulation
  6. 2025PAC Bench: Do Foundation Models Understand Prerequisites for Executing Manipulation Policies?
  7. 2026KinDER: A Physical Reasoning Benchmark for Robot Learning and Planning
  8. 2023Task and Motion Planning with Large Language Models for Object Rearrangement