mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PhysMem: Scaling Test-Time Memory for Embodied Physical Reasoning

arXiv 2602.20323 ↗First posted 23 Feb 2026cs.RO cs.AIcited by 2

On the map: LLM reasoning → Spatial and embodied reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reliable object manipulation requires understanding physical properties that vary across objects and environments. Vision-language model (VLM) planners can reason about friction and stability in general terms; however, they often cannot predict how a specific ball will roll on a particular surface or which stone will provide a stable foundation without direct experience. We present PhysMem, a memory framework that enables VLM robot planners to learn physical principles from interaction at test time, without updating model parameters. The system records experiences, generates candidate hypotheses, and verifies them through targeted interaction before promoting validated knowledge to guide future decisions. A central design choice is verification before application: the system tests hypotheses against new observations rather than applying retrieved experience directly, reducing rigid reliance on prior experience when physical conditions change. We evaluate PhysMem on three real-world manipulation tasks and simulation benchmarks across four VLM backbones. On a controlled brick insertion task, principled abstraction achieves 76% success compared to 23% for direct experience retrieval, and real-world experiments show consistent improvement over 30-minute deployment sessions.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Spatial and embodied reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 26 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2026.

Builds on

26 of 68 references.

References · 26

  1. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
  2. 2023RT-2: Vision-Language-Action Models Transfer Web Knowledge to Robotic Controlcited by 2,993
  3. 2025Qwen3-VL Technical Reportcited by 2,534
  4. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,297
  5. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
  6. 2023PaLM-E: An Embodied Multimodal Language Modelcited by 2,037
  7. 2022RT-1: Robotics Transformer for Real-World Control at Scalecited by 2,007
  8. 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,193
  9. 2025GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robotscited by 1,167
  10. 2023Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Modelscited by 849
  11. 2025Cosmos World Foundation Model Platform for Physical AIcited by 833
  12. 2025π*0.6: a VLA That Learns From Experiencecited by 280
14 more
  1. 2025Motus: A Unified Latent Action World Modelcited by 231
  2. 2025MemoryVLA: Perceptual-Cognitive Memory in Vision-Language-Action Models for Robotic Manipulationcited by 183
  3. 2016Model-Free Episodic Controlcited by 100
  4. 2024What Matters in Building Vision-Language-Action Models for Generalist Robotscited by 88
  5. 2025Gemini Robotics 1.5: Pushing the Frontier of Generalist Robots with Advanced Embodied Reasoning, Thinking, and Motion Transfercited by 86
  6. 2025Chain-of-Visual-Thought: Teaching VLMs to See and Think Better with Continuous Visual Tokenscited by 65
  7. 2025MemER: Scaling Up Memory for Robot Control via Experience Retrievalcited by 64
  8. 2025SAM2Act: Integrating Visual Foundation Model with A Memory Architecture for Robotic Manipulationcited by 58
  9. 2025Reflective Planning: Vision-Language Models for Multi-Stage Long-Horizon Robotic Manipulationcited by 40
  10. 2026VLM4VLA: Revisiting Vision-Language-Models in Vision-Language-Action Modelscited by 38
  11. 2025MAP-VLA: Memory-Augmented Prompting for Vision-Language-Action Model in Robotic Manipulationcited by 28
  12. 2025SIMA 2: A Generalist Embodied Agent for Virtual Worldscited by 26
  13. 2025Tactile-VLA: Unlocking Vision-Language-Action Model's Physical Knowledge for Tactile Generalizationcited by 16
  14. 2024Scene Exploration by Vision-Language Modelscited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026KinDER: A Physical Reasoning Benchmark for Robot Learning and Planning
  2. 2026PhysVLA: Towards Physically-Grounded VLA for Embodied Robotic Manipulation
  3. 2025Rethinking Progression of Memory State in Robotic Manipulation: An Object-Centric Perspective
  4. 2026PhysCaP: Grounding Code-as-Policy Agent with Physics-Informed Exploration
  5. 2023Physically Grounded Vision-Language Models for Robotic Manipulation
  6. 2025SIMPACT: Simulation-Enabled Action Planning using Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026ManipulationNet: An Infrastructure for Benchmarking Real-World Robot Manipulation with Physical Skill Challenges and Embodied Multimodal Reasoning
  8. 2026RoboHarn-Evo: Evolving Hierarchical Physical Knowledge for Self-Improving Robotic Manipulation