mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stability-Aware Training of Machine Learning Force Fields with Differentiable Boltzmann Estimators

arXiv 2402.13984 ↗First posted 21 Feb 2024cs.LG cond-mat.dis-nn cond-mat.mtrl-scicited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning force fields (MLFFs) are an attractive alternative to ab-initio methods for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. However, they can produce unstable simulations, limiting their ability to model phenomena occurring over longer timescales and compromising the quality of estimated observables. To address these challenges, we present Stability-Aware Boltzmann Estimator (StABlE) Training, a multi-modal training procedure which leverages joint supervision from reference quantum-mechanical calculations and system observables. StABlE Training iteratively runs many MD simulations in parallel to seek out unstable regions, and corrects the instabilities via supervision with a reference observable. We achieve efficient end-to-end automatic differentiation through MD simulations using our Boltzmann Estimator, a generalization of implicit differentiation techniques to a broader class of stochastic algorithms. Unlike existing techniques based on active learning, our approach requires no additional ab-initio energy and forces calculations to correct instabilities. We demonstrate our methodology across organic molecules, tetrapeptides, and condensed phase systems, using three modern MLFF architectures. StABlE-trained models achieve significant improvements in simulation stability, data efficiency, and agreement with reference observables. The stability improvements cannot be matched by reducing the simulation timestep; thus, StABlE Training effectively allows for larger timesteps. By incorporating observables into the training process alongside first-principles calculations, StABlE Training can be viewed as a general semi-empirical framework applicable across MLFF architectures and systems. This makes it a powerful tool for training stable and accurate MLFFs, particularly in the absence of large reference datasets. Our code is available at https://github.com/ASK-Berkeley/StABlE-Training.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 80 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Feb 2024.

Builds on

26 of 80 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 3,733
  2. 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 701
  3. 2017OptNet: Differentiable Optimization as a Layer in Neural Networkscited by 588
  4. 2020Directional Message Passing for Molecular Graphscited by 556
  5. 2022MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fieldscited by 467
  6. 2021Equivariant message passing for the prediction of tensorial properties and molecular spectracited by 438
  7. 2022Learning Local Equivariant Representations for Large-Scale Atomistic Dynamicscited by 254
  8. 2021Efficient and Modular Implicit Differentiationcited by 199
  9. 2021Spherical Message Passing for 3D Graph Networkscited by 166
  10. 2016On Differentiating Parameterized Argmin and Argmax Problems with Application to Bi-level Optimizationcited by 108
  11. 2018Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learningcited by 80
  12. 2021ForceNet: A Graph Neural Network for Large-Scale Quantum Calculationscited by 58
14 more
  1. 2022Machine Learning Coarse-Grained Potentials of Protein Thermodynamicscited by 37
  2. 2022Learning differentiable solvers for systems with hard constraintscited by 34
  3. 2023Scaling the leading accuracy of deep equivariant models to biomolecular simulations of realistic sizecited by 33
  4. 2022Learning continuous models for continuous physicscited by 28
  5. 2021Learning neural network potentials from experimental data via Differentiable Trajectory Reweightingcited by 26
  6. 2020Differentiable Molecular Simulations for Control and Learningcited by 25
  7. 2023EGraFFBench: Evaluation of Equivariant Graph Neural Network Force Fields for Atomistic Simulationscited by 15
  8. 2020Committee neural network potentials control generalization errors and enable active learningcited by 14
  9. 2023Accurate machine learning force fields via experimental and simulation data fusioncited by 12
  10. 2023Data efficiency and extrapolation trends in neural network interatomic potentialscited by 10
  11. 2022Learned Force Fields Are Ready For Ground State Catalyst Discoverycited by 8
  12. 2023Differentiable Simulations for Enhanced Sampling of Rare Eventscited by 7
  13. 2022Learning Pair Potentials using Differentiable Simulationscited by 4
  14. 2023Top-down machine learning of coarse-grained protein force-fieldscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

8 papers.