Understanding and Mitigating Distribution Shifts For Machine Learning Force Fields
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Learning Force Fields (MLFFs) are a promising alternative to expensive ab initio quantum mechanical molecular simulations. Given the diversity of chemical spaces that are of interest and the cost of generating new data, it is important to understand how MLFFs generalize beyond their training distributions. In order to characterize and better understand distribution shifts in MLFFs, we conduct diagnostic experiments on chemical datasets, revealing common shifts that pose significant challenges, even for large foundation models trained on extensive data. Based on these observations, we hypothesize that current supervised training methods inadequately regularize MLFFs, resulting in overfitting and learning poor representations of out-of-distribution systems. We then propose two new methods as initial steps for mitigating distribution shifts for MLFFs. Our methods focus on test-time refinement strategies that incur minimal computational cost and do not use expensive ab initio reference labels. The first strategy, based on spectral graph theory, modifies the edges of test graphs to align with graph structures seen during training. Our second strategy improves representations for out-of-distribution systems at test-time by taking gradient steps using an auxiliary objective, such as a cheap physical prior. Our test-time refinement strategies significantly reduce errors on out-of-distribution systems, suggesting that MLFFs are capable of and can move towards modeling diverse chemical spaces, but are not being effectively trained to do so. Our experiments establish clear benchmarks for evaluating the generalization capabilities of the next generation of MLFFs. Our code is available at https://tkreiman.github.io/projects/mlff_distribution_shifts/.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Mar 2025.
Builds on
30 of 66 references.
References · 30
- 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
- 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 701
- 2017SchNet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactionscited by 569
- 2022MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fieldscited by 467
- 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
- 2021GemNet: Universal Directional Graph Neural Networks for Moleculescited by 342
- 2018Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Linear Convolutional Networkscited by 251
- 2020The Open Catalyst 2020 (OC20) Dataset and Community Challengescited by 246
- 2017Deep Potential Molecular Dynamics: a scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanicscited by 213
- 2022Test-Time Training with Masked Autoencoderscited by 208
- 2023EquiformerV2: Improved Equivariant Transformer for Scaling to Higher-Degree Representationscited by 201
- 2020Domain Adaptive Ensemble Learningcited by 156
18 more
- 2022The Open Catalyst 2022 (OC22) Dataset and Challenges for Oxide Electrocatalystscited by 95
- 2022Forces are not Enough: Benchmark and Critical Evaluation for Machine Learning Force Fields with Molecular Simulationscited by 92
- 2023Test-Time Training on Nearest Neighbors for Large Language Modelscited by 82
- 2025Learning Smooth and Expressive Interatomic Potentials for Physical Property Predictioncited by 79
- 2022Test-Time Adaptation via Self-Training with Nearest Neighbor Informationcited by 64
- 2022GemNet-OC: Developing Graph Neural Networks for Large and Diverse Molecular Simulation Datasetscited by 61
- 2021OOD-CV: A Benchmark for Robustness to Out-of-Distribution Shifts of Individual Nuisances in Natural Imagescited by 46
- 2024The Importance of Being Scalable: Improving the Speed and Accuracy of Neural Network Interatomic Potentials Across Chemical Domainscited by 40
- 2023From Molecules to Materials: Pre-training Large Generalizable Models for Atomic Property Predictioncited by 39
- 2022Transition1x -- a Dataset for Building Generalizable Reactive Machine Learning Potentialscited by 37
- 2023Graph Neural Networks Use Graphs When They Shouldn'tcited by 25
- 2023EGraFFBench: Evaluation of Equivariant Graph Neural Network Force Fields for Atomistic Simulationscited by 15
- 2025Towards Fast, Specialized Machine Learning Force Fields: Distilling Foundation Models via Energy Hessianscited by 15
- 2024chemtrain: Learning Deep Potential Models via Automatic Differentiation and Statistical Physicscited by 12
- 2024Stability-Aware Training of Machine Learning Force Fields with Differentiable Boltzmann Estimatorscited by 8
- 2023Synthetic pre-training for neural-network interatomic potentialscited by 6
- 2024Overcoming systematic softening in universal machine learning interatomic potentials by fine-tuningcited by 6
- 2022Injecting Domain Knowledge from Empirical Interatomic Potentials to Neural Networks for Predicting Material Propertiescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.