mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Evaluation to Design: Using Potential Energy Surface Smoothness Metrics to Guide Machine Learning Interatomic Potential Architectures

arXiv 2602.04861 ↗First posted 4 Feb 2026cs.LG cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials (MLIPs) sometimes fail to reproduce the physical smoothness of the quantum potential energy surface (PES), leading to erroneous behavior in downstream simulations that standard energy and force regression evaluations can miss. Existing evaluations, such as microcanonical molecular dynamics (MD), are computationally expensive and primarily probe near-equilibrium states. To improve evaluation metrics for MLIPs, we introduce the Bond Smoothness Characterization Test (BSCT). This efficient benchmark probes the PES via controlled bond deformations and detects non-smoothness, including discontinuities, artificial minima, and spurious forces, both near and far from equilibrium. We show that BSCT correlates strongly with MD stability while requiring a fraction of the cost of MD. To demonstrate how BSCT can guide iterative model design, we utilize an unconstrained Transformer backbone as a testbed, illustrating how refinements such as a new differentiable k-nearest neighbors algorithm and temperature-controlled attention reduce artifacts identified by our metric. By optimizing model design systematically based on BSCT, the resulting MLIP simultaneously achieves a low conventional E/F regression error, stable MD simulations, and robust atomistic property predictions. Our results establish BSCT as both a validation metric for practitioners to assess MLIP utility and as an "in-the-loop" model design proxy that alerts MLIP developers to physical challenges that cannot be efficiently evaluated by current MLIP benchmarks. The BSCT dataset and evaluation are available on https://github.com/ryanliu30/bsct.git

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Feb 2026.

Builds on

24 of 67 references.

References · 24

  1. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  2. 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 701
  3. 2020Directional Message Passing for Molecular Graphscited by 556
  4. 2022MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fieldscited by 467
  5. 2021GemNet: Universal Directional Graph Neural Networks for Moleculescited by 342
  6. 2022Learning Local Equivariant Representations for Large-Scale Atomistic Dynamicscited by 254
  7. 2020The Open Catalyst 2020 (OC20) Dataset and Community Challengescited by 246
  8. 2023EquiformerV2: Improved Equivariant Transformer for Scaling to Higher-Degree Representationscited by 201
  9. 2025UMA: A Family of Universal Models for Atomscited by 99
  10. 2022Forces are not Enough: Benchmark and Critical Evaluation for Machine Learning Force Fields with Molecular Simulationscited by 92
  11. 2022SPICE, A Dataset of Drug-like Molecules and Peptides for Training Machine Learning Potentialscited by 80
  12. 2025Learning Smooth and Expressive Interatomic Potentials for Physical Property Predictioncited by 79
12 more
  1. 2024The Importance of Being Scalable: Improving the Speed and Accuracy of Neural Network Interatomic Potentials Across Chemical Domainscited by 40
  2. 2023Smooth, exact rotational symmetrization for deep learning on point cloudscited by 39
  3. 2023Matbench Discovery -- A framework to evaluate machine learning crystal stability predictionscited by 34
  4. 2024Cartesian atomic cluster expansion for machine learning interatomic potentialscited by 31
  5. 2024The dark side of the forces: assessing non-conservative force models for atomistic machine learningcited by 23
  6. 2025PET-MAD, a lightweight universal interatomic potential for advanced materials modelingcited by 23
  7. 2024Generalizing Denoising to Non-Equilibrium Structures Improves Equivariant Force Fieldscited by 18
  8. 2025MLIP Arena: Advancing Fairness and Transparency in Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials via an Open, Accessible Benchmark Platformcited by 9
  9. 2024Stability-Aware Training of Machine Learning Force Fields with Differentiable Boltzmann Estimatorscited by 8
  10. 2025Transformers Discover Molecular Structure Without Graph Priorscited by 6
  11. 2025Energy & Force Regression on DFT Trajectories is Not Enough for Universal Machine Learning Interatomic Potentialscited by 4
  12. 2025A Materials Foundation Model via Hybrid Invariant-Equivariant Architecturescited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.