mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Accurate machine learning force fields via experimental and simulation data fusion

arXiv 2308.09142 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2023physics.chem-ph cs.LG physics.comp-phcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning (ML)-based force fields are attracting ever-increasing interest due to their capacity to span spatiotemporal scales of classical interatomic potentials at quantum-level accuracy. They can be trained based on high-fidelity simulations or experiments, the former being the common case. However, both approaches are impaired by scarce and erroneous data resulting in models that either do not agree with well-known experimental observations or are under-constrained and only reproduce some properties. Here we leverage both Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations and experimentally measured mechanical properties and lattice parameters to train an ML potential of titanium. We demonstrate that the fused data learning strategy can concurrently satisfy all target objectives, thus resulting in a molecular model of higher accuracy compared to the models trained with a single data source. The inaccuracies of DFT functionals at target experimental properties were corrected, while the investigated off-target properties remained largely unperturbed. Our approach is applicable to any material and can serve as a general strategy to obtain highly accurate ML potentials.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 88 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2023.

Builds on

16 of 88 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
  2. 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 701
  3. 2017SchNet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactionscited by 569
  4. 2020Fast and Uncertainty-Aware Directional Message Passing for Non-Equilibrium Moleculescited by 254
  5. 2022Learning Local Equivariant Representations for Large-Scale Atomistic Dynamicscited by 254
  6. 2018Less is more: sampling chemical space with active learningcited by 80
  7. 2022GemNet-OC: Developing Graph Neural Networks for Large and Diverse Molecular Simulation Datasetscited by 61
  8. 2020TorchMD: A deep learning framework for molecular simulationscited by 55
  9. 2018Active Learning of Uniformly Accurate Inter-atomic Potentials for Materials Simulationcited by 37
  10. 2023Single-model uncertainty quantification in neural network potentials does not consistently outperform model ensemblescited by 30
  11. 2021Learning neural network potentials from experimental data via Differentiable Trajectory Reweightingcited by 26
  12. 2020Differentiable Molecular Simulations for Control and Learningcited by 25
4 more
  1. 2022Fast Uncertainty Estimates in Deep Learning Interatomic Potentialscited by 22
  2. 2022Scalable Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification for Neural Network Potentials: Promise and Pitfallscited by 11
  3. 2022Learning Pair Potentials using Differentiable Simulationscited by 4
  4. 2023Top-down machine learning of coarse-grained protein force-fieldscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 9.

12 papers.