mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Transformers Discover Molecular Structure Without Graph Priors

arXiv 2510.02259 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2025cs.LG cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.chem-phcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computational simulations play a central role in scientific discovery, and machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising alternative to traditional physics-based modeling. However, scientific modeling requires physically meaningful predictions, raising a fundamental question for data-driven methods: to what extent can physical inductive biases-that is, prior assumptions about the structure of the physical world-emerge by learning from data alone? In this work, we study atomistic modeling, a representative field in the computational sciences where ML architectures have historically embedded strong physical inductive biases-such as geometric locality and graph structure. We develop a systematic understanding of how physical patterns can alternatively be discovered directly from data by training a model without domain-specific priors, including any manually defined atomistic pairwise interactions. We find that the model autonomously recovers key physical structure, such as learned interatomic interaction strengths that mirror classical electrostatics and interaction cutoffs consistent with traditional physical models. We further demonstrate predictable neural scaling law behavior with increased data and compute, and find accuracy on certain metrics competitive with physics-informed architectures. Our results clarify the boundary between engineered inductive biases and learnable physical structure, suggesting that general-purpose architectures can serve as principled baselines for scientific modeling by learning fundamental physical structure directly from data.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 52 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2025.

Builds on

52 of 84 references.

References · 52

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  5. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  6. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
  7. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
  8. 2017Neural Message Passing for Quantum Chemistrycited by 3,460
  9. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  10. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  11. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
  12. 2024OpenVLA: An Open-Source Vision-Language-Action Modelcited by 2,777
38 more
  1. 2024Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally can be More Effective than Scaling Model Parameterscited by 1,928
  2. 2024Octo: An Open-Source Generalist Robot Policycited by 1,427
  3. 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 813
  4. 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 795
  5. 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 702
  6. 2021E(3)-Equivariant Graph Neural Networks for Data-Efficient and Accurate Interatomic Potentialscited by 701
  7. 2022What learning algorithm is in-context learning? Investigations with linear modelscited by 671
  8. 2017In-Datacenter Performance Analysis of a Tensor Processing Unitcited by 610
  9. 2017SchNet: A continuous-filter convolutional neural network for modeling quantum interactionscited by 569
  10. 2020Scaling Laws for Autoregressive Generative Modelingcited by 510
  11. 2021Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvaturecited by 471
  12. 2022MACE: Higher Order Equivariant Message Passing Neural Networks for Fast and Accurate Force Fieldscited by 467
  13. 2019Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?cited by 404
  14. 2021GemNet: Universal Directional Graph Neural Networks for Moleculescited by 342
  15. 2020The Open Catalyst 2020 (OC20) Dataset and Community Challengescited by 246
  16. 2023A Survey on Oversmoothing in Graph Neural Networkscited by 246
  17. 2017Deep Potential Molecular Dynamics: a scalable model with the accuracy of quantum mechanicscited by 213
  18. 2020Machine Learning Force Fieldscited by 204
  19. 2023EquiformerV2: Improved Equivariant Transformer for Scaling to Higher-Degree Representationscited by 201
  20. 2022Pure Transformers are Powerful Graph Learnerscited by 188
  21. 2021Frame Averaging for Invariant and Equivariant Network Designcited by 166
  22. 2023On Over-Squashing in Message Passing Neural Networks: The Impact of Width, Depth, and Topologycited by 163
  23. 2025UMA: A Family of Universal Models for Atomscited by 99
  24. 2022Forces are not Enough: Benchmark and Critical Evaluation for Machine Learning Force Fields with Molecular Simulationscited by 92
  25. 2022SPICE, A Dataset of Drug-like Molecules and Peptides for Training Machine Learning Potentialscited by 80
  26. 2025Learning Smooth and Expressive Interatomic Potentials for Physical Property Predictioncited by 79
  27. 2025All-atom Diffusion Transformers: Unified generative modelling of molecules and materialscited by 75
  28. 2024Uncertainty Estimation and Quantification for LLMs: A Simple Supervised Approachcited by 73
  29. 2022Rediscovering orbital mechanics with machine learningcited by 71
  30. 2024Orb: A Fast, Scalable Neural Network Potentialcited by 63
  31. 2023Language models can generate molecules, materials, and protein binding sites directly in three dimensions as XYZ, CIF, and PDB filescited by 59
  32. 2024The Importance of Being Scalable: Improving the Speed and Accuracy of Neural Network Interatomic Potentials Across Chemical Domainscited by 40
  33. 2025PET-MAD, a lightweight universal interatomic potential for advanced materials modelingcited by 23
  34. 2023EGraFFBench: Evaluation of Equivariant Graph Neural Network Force Fields for Atomistic Simulationscited by 15
  35. 2025Probing Equivariance and Symmetry Breaking in Convolutional Networkscited by 12
  36. 2025How simple can you go? An off-the-shelf transformer approach to molecular dynamicscited by 10
  37. 2025MLIP Arena: Advancing Fairness and Transparency in Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials via an Open, Accessible Benchmark Platformcited by 9
  38. 2024Stability-Aware Training of Machine Learning Force Fields with Differentiable Boltzmann Estimatorscited by 8

50 most cited of 52 All 52 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 5.

6 papers.