mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

LISR: Learning Linear 3D Implicit Surface Representation Using Compactly Supported Radial Basis Functions

arXiv 2402.07301 ↗First posted 11 Feb 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Implicit 3D surface reconstruction of an object from its partial and noisy 3D point cloud scan is the classical geometry processing and 3D computer vision problem. In the literature, various 3D shape representations have been developed, differing in memory efficiency and shape retrieval effectiveness, such as volumetric, parametric, and implicit surfaces. Radial basis functions provide memory-efficient parameterization of the implicit surface. However, we show that training a neural network using the mean squared error between the ground-truth implicit surface and the linear basis-based implicit surfaces does not converge to the global solution. In this work, we propose locally supported compact radial basis functions for a linear representation of the implicit surface. This representation enables us to generate 3D shapes with arbitrary topologies at any resolution due to their continuous nature. We then propose a neural network architecture for learning the linear implicit shape representation of the 3D surface of an object. We learn linear implicit shapes within a supervised learning framework using ground truth Signed-Distance Field (SDF) data for guidance. The classical strategies face difficulties in finding linear implicit shapes from a given 3D point cloud due to numerical issues (requires solving inverse of a large matrix) in basis and query point selection. The proposed approach achieves better Chamfer distance and comparable F-score than the state-of-the-art approach on the benchmark dataset. We also show the effectiveness of the proposed approach by using it for the 3D shape completion task.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Feb 2024.

Builds on

43 of 59 references.

References · 43

  1. 2017ScanNet: Richly-annotated 3D Reconstructions of Indoor Scenescited by 3,088
  2. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,880
  3. 2019DeepSDF: Learning Continuous Signed Distance Functions for Shape Representationcited by 2,682
  4. 2018Occupancy Networks: Learning 3D Reconstruction in Function Spacecited by 2,037
  5. 2018Learning Implicit Fields for Generative Shape Modelingcited by 1,060
  6. 2019Scene Representation Networks: Continuous 3D-Structure-Aware Neural Scene Representationscited by 864
  7. 2019PIFu: Pixel-Aligned Implicit Function for High-Resolution Clothed Human Digitizationcited by 818
  8. 2020Convolutional Occupancy Networkscited by 760
  9. 2019Differentiable Volumetric Rendering: Learning Implicit 3D Representations without 3D Supervisioncited by 699
  10. 20163D-R2N2: A Unified Approach for Single and Multi-view 3D Object Reconstructioncited by 587
  11. 2016Learning a Probabilistic Latent Space of Object Shapes via 3D Generative-Adversarial Modelingcited by 558
  12. 2018PCN: Point Completion Networkcited by 382
31 more
  1. 2020Local Implicit Grid Representations for 3D Scenescited by 372
  2. 2020Implicit Functions in Feature Space for 3D Shape Reconstruction and Completioncited by 343
  3. 2016OctNet: Learning Deep 3D Representations at High Resolutionscited by 340
  4. 2019DISN: Deep Implicit Surface Network for High-quality Single-view 3D Reconstructioncited by 332
  5. 2020Deep Local Shapes: Learning Local SDF Priors for Detailed 3D Reconstructioncited by 321
  6. 2021PoinTr: Diverse Point Cloud Completion with Geometry-Aware Transformerscited by 284
  7. 2021ICON: Implicit Clothed humans Obtained from Normalscited by 283
  8. 2019What Do Single-view 3D Reconstruction Networks Learn?cited by 259
  9. 2019Learning Shape Templates with Structured Implicit Functionscited by 242
  10. 2016Shape Completion using 3D-Encoder-Predictor CNNs and Shape Synthesiscited by 219
  11. 2022AutoSDF: Shape Priors for 3D Completion, Reconstruction and Generationcited by 208
  12. 2019CvxNet: Learnable Convex Decompositioncited by 173
  13. 2019NASA: Neural Articulated Shape Approximationcited by 149
  14. 2021Improving neural implicit surfaces geometry with patch warpingcited by 136
  15. 2020Points2Surf: Learning Implicit Surfaces from Point Cloud Patchescited by 122
  16. 2019Learning to Infer Implicit Surfaces without 3D Supervisioncited by 103
  17. 2021Variational Relational Point Completion Networkcited by 103
  18. 2021Neural-GIF: Neural Generalized Implicit Functions for Animating People in Clothingcited by 102
  19. 2022REGTR: End-to-end Point Cloud Correspondences with Transformerscited by 94
  20. 20223DILG: Irregular Latent Grids for 3D Generative Modelingcited by 92
  21. 2017Hierarchical Surface Prediction for 3D Object Reconstructioncited by 89
  22. 2021Deep Implicit Moving Least-Squares Functions for 3D Reconstructioncited by 67
  23. 2019Deep Level Sets: Implicit Surface Representations for 3D Shape Inferencecited by 52
  24. 2017Deformable Shape Completion with Graph Convolutional Autoencoderscited by 50
  25. 2022Surface Reconstruction from Point Clouds: A Survey and a Benchmarkcited by 41
  26. 2021Deep Implicit Surface Point Prediction Networkscited by 40
  27. 2022Snowflake Point Deconvolution for Point Cloud Completion and Generation with Skip-Transformercited by 38
  28. 20213DIAS: 3D Shape Reconstruction with Implicit Algebraic Surfacescited by 17
  29. 2021Robust Partial-to-Partial Point Cloud Registration in a Full Rangecited by 8
  30. 2022PatchRD: Detail-Preserving Shape Completion by Learning Patch Retrieval and Deformationcited by 7
  31. 2015A Closed-Form Formulation of HRBF-Based Surface Reconstructioncited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.