Masked IRL: LLM-Guided Reward Disambiguation from Demonstrations and Language
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Reward modeling and RLHF
Abstract (arXiv)
Robots can adapt to user preferences by learning reward functions from demonstrations, but with limited data, reward models often overfit to spurious correlations and fail to generalize. This happens because demonstrations show robots how to do a task but not what matters for that task, causing the model to focus on irrelevant state details. Natural language can more directly specify what the robot should focus on, and, in principle, disambiguate between many reward functions consistent with the demonstrations. However, existing language-conditioned reward learning methods typically treat instructions as simple conditioning signals, without fully exploiting their potential to resolve ambiguity. Moreover, real instructions are often ambiguous themselves, so naive conditioning is unreliable. Our key insight is that these two input types carry complementary information: demonstrations show how to act, while language specifies what is important. We propose Masked Inverse Reinforcement Learning (Masked IRL), a framework that uses large language models (LLMs) to combine the strengths of both input types. Masked IRL infers state-relevance masks from language instructions and enforces invariance to irrelevant state components. When instructions are ambiguous, it uses LLM reasoning to clarify them in the context of the demonstrations. In simulation and on a real robot, Masked IRL outperforms prior language-conditioned IRL methods by up to 15% while using up to 4.7 times less data, demonstrating improved sample-efficiency, generalization, and robustness to ambiguous language. Project page: https://MIT-CLEAR-Lab.github.io/Masked-IRL and Code: https://github.com/MIT-CLEAR-Lab/Masked-IRL
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reward modeling and RLHF, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 17 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Nov 2025.
Builds on
17 of 22 references.
Closest ancestors · 2
Same direction, newest first
- 2023Promptable Behaviors: Personalizing Multi-Objective Rewards from Human Preferences14 Dec
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferences12 Jun
Other references · 15
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,302
- 2017FiLM: Visual Reasoning with a General Conditioning Layercited by 2,286
- 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,172
- 2023Language to Rewards for Robotic Skill Synthesiscited by 307
- 2020Safe Imitation Learning via Fast Bayesian Reward Inference from Preferencescited by 73
- 2019From Language to Goals: Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Based Instruction Followingcited by 67
- 2023"No, to the Right" -- Online Language Corrections for Robotic Manipulation via Shared Autonomycited by 60
- 2024Trajectory Improvement and Reward Learning from Comparative Language Feedbackcited by 17
- 2022Inducing Structure in Reward Learning by Learning Featurescited by 16
- 2021Situational Confidence Assistance for Lifelong Shared Autonomycited by 15
- 2023SIRL: Similarity-based Implicit Representation Learningcited by 13
3 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 4.
4 papers.
- 2026Robometer: Scaling General-Purpose Robotic Reward Models via Trajectory Comparisonscited by 51
- 2026Online World Modeling Enables Real-World Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observationcited by 0
- 2026Robots That Know What to Ask: Recovering Misaligned Rewards through Targeted Explanationscited by 0
- 2026Bayesian Active Learning for Intent Disambiguation in Interactive Robot Planningcited by 0
- 2026Bayesian Active Learning for Intent Disambiguation in Interactive Robot Planning28 Sep 2026
- 2026Robots That Know What to Ask: Recovering Misaligned Rewards through Targeted Explanations21 May 2026
- 2026Robometer: Scaling General-Purpose Robotic Reward Models via Trajectory Comparisons2 Mar 2026
- 2026Online World Modeling Enables Real-World Inverse Reinforcement Learning from Observation27 Feb 2026
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Video-Language Critic: Transferable Reward Functions for Language-Conditioned Robotics
- 2024Rethinking Mutual Information for Language Conditioned Skill Discovery on Imitation Learning
- 2025ReWiND: Language-Guided Rewards Teach Robot Policies without New Demonstrations
- 2026From Demonstrations to Rewards: Test-Time Prompt Optimization for VLM Reward Models
- 2024ELEMENTAL: Interactive Learning from Demonstrations and Vision-Language Models for Reward Design in Robotics
- 2026Inverse RL Helps Align AI by Imitating Humans
- 2023BC-IRL: Learning Generalizable Reward Functions from Demonstrations
- 2024Policy Adaptation via Language Optimization: Decomposing Tasks for Few-Shot Imitation