mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Distribution-Free Conformal Joint Prediction Regions for Neural Marked Temporal Point Processes

arXiv 2401.04612 ↗First posted 9 Jan 2024cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Sequences of labeled events observed at irregular intervals in continuous time are ubiquitous across various fields. Temporal Point Processes (TPPs) provide a mathematical framework for modeling these sequences, enabling inferences such as predicting the arrival time of future events and their associated label, called mark. However, due to model misspecification or lack of training data, these probabilistic models may provide a poor approximation of the true, unknown underlying process, with prediction regions extracted from them being unreliable estimates of the underlying uncertainty. This paper develops more reliable methods for uncertainty quantification in neural TPP models via the framework of conformal prediction. A primary objective is to generate a distribution-free joint prediction region for an event's arrival time and mark, with a finite-sample marginal coverage guarantee. A key challenge is to handle both a strictly positive, continuous response and a categorical response, without distributional assumptions. We first consider a simple but conservative approach that combines individual prediction regions for the event's arrival time and mark. Then, we introduce a more effective method based on bivariate highest density regions derived from the joint predictive density of arrival times and marks. By leveraging the dependencies between these two variables, this method excludes unlikely combinations of the two, resulting in sharper prediction regions while still attaining the pre-specified coverage level. We also explore the generation of individual univariate prediction regions for events' arrival times and marks through conformal regression and classification techniques. Moreover, we evaluate the stronger notion of conditional coverage. Finally, through extensive experimentation on both simulated and real-world datasets, we assess the validity and efficiency of these methods.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jan 2024.

Builds on

42 of 72 references.

References · 42

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  3. 2021A Gentle Introduction to Conformal Prediction and Distribution-Free Uncertainty Quantificationcited by 777
  4. 2019Conformalized Quantile Regressioncited by 620
  5. 2019Conformal Prediction Under Covariate Shiftcited by 511
  6. 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 443
  7. 2020Classification with Valid and Adaptive Coveragecited by 390
  8. 2020Uncertainty Sets for Image Classifiers using Conformal Predictioncited by 365
  9. 2021Adaptive Conformal Inference Under Distribution Shiftcited by 360
  10. 2016Least Ambiguous Set-Valued Classifiers with Bounded Error Levelscited by 270
  11. 2021Learn then Test: Calibrating Predictive Algorithms to Achieve Risk Controlcited by 256
  12. 2020Transformer Hawkes Processcited by 230
30 more
  1. 2022Adaptive Conformal Predictions for Time Seriescited by 155
  2. 2019Intensity-Free Learning of Temporal Point Processescited by 138
  3. 2019Fully Neural Network based Model for General Temporal Point Processescited by 119
  4. 2021Neural Temporal Point Processes: A Reviewcited by 113
  5. 2021Transformer Embeddings of Irregularly Spaced Events and Their Participantscited by 90
  6. 2023Conformal PID Control for Time Series Predictioncited by 85
  7. 2021Conformal Prediction using Conditional Histogramscited by 77
  8. 2019A comparison of some conformal quantile regression methodscited by 76
  9. 2020CD-split and HPD-split: efficient conformal regions in high dimensionscited by 74
  10. 2020Conformal prediction for time seriescited by 53
  11. 2021Conformalized Survival Analysiscited by 53
  12. 2021Calibrated Multiple-Output Quantile Regression with Representation Learningcited by 49
  13. 2017Wasserstein Learning of Deep Generative Point Process Modelscited by 46
  14. 2018Lecture Notes: Temporal Point Processes and the Conditional Intensity Functioncited by 40
  15. 2018Learning Temporal Point Processes via Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  16. 2020Neural Temporal Point Processes For Modelling Electronic Health Recordscited by 39
  17. 2015COEVOLVE: A Joint Point Process Model for Information Diffusion and Network Co-evolutioncited by 37
  18. 2018Distribution-Free Prediction Sets for Two-Layer Hierarchical Modelscited by 34
  19. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning of Marked Temporal Point Processescited by 32
  20. 2022Copula Conformal Prediction for Multi-step Time Series Forecastingcited by 28
  21. 2019Self-Attentive Hawkes Processescited by 23
  22. 2020Noise-Contrastive Estimation for Multivariate Point Processescited by 20
  23. 2020User-Dependent Neural Sequence Models for Continuous-Time Event Datacited by 17
  24. 2022Conformalized survival analysis with adaptive cutoffscited by 17
  25. 2014Shaping Social Activity by Incentivizing Userscited by 15
  26. 2018Representation Learning over Dynamic Graphscited by 14
  27. 2023On the Predictive Accuracy of Neural Temporal Point Process Models for Continuous-time Event Datacited by 13
  28. 2023Testing exchangeability by pairwise bettingcited by 8
  29. 2022Modeling Inter-Dependence Between Time and Mark in Multivariate Temporal Point Processescited by 7
  30. 2014Estimation of slowly decreasing Hawkes kernels: Application to high frequency order book modellingcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

7 papers.