mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Predictive Accuracy of Neural Temporal Point Process Models for Continuous-time Event Data

arXiv 2306.17066 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2023cs.LGcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Temporal Point Processes (TPPs) serve as the standard mathematical framework for modeling asynchronous event sequences in continuous time. However, classical TPP models are often constrained by strong assumptions, limiting their ability to capture complex real-world event dynamics. To overcome this limitation, researchers have proposed Neural TPPs, which leverage neural network parametrizations to offer more flexible and efficient modeling. While recent studies demonstrate the effectiveness of Neural TPPs, they often lack a unified setup, relying on different baselines, datasets, and experimental configurations. This makes it challenging to identify the key factors driving improvements in predictive accuracy, hindering research progress. To bridge this gap, we present a comprehensive large-scale experimental study that systematically evaluates the predictive accuracy of state-of-the-art neural TPP models. Our study encompasses multiple real-world and synthetic event sequence datasets, following a carefully designed unified setup. We thoroughly investigate the influence of major architectural components such as event encoding, history encoder, and decoder parametrization on both time and mark prediction tasks. Additionally, we delve into the less explored area of probabilistic calibration for neural TPP models. By analyzing our results, we draw insightful conclusions regarding the significance of history size and the impact of architectural components on predictive accuracy. Furthermore, we shed light on the miscalibration of mark distributions in neural TPP models. Our study aims to provide valuable insights into the performance and characteristics of neural TPP models, contributing to a better understanding of their strengths and limitations.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2023.

Builds on

24 of 57 references.

References · 24

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  3. 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 443
  4. 2018Accurate Uncertainties for Deep Learning Using Calibrated Regressioncited by 417
  5. 2019Time2Vec: Learning a Vector Representation of Timecited by 208
  6. 2019Intensity-Free Learning of Temporal Point Processescited by 138
  7. 2019Fully Neural Network based Model for General Temporal Point Processescited by 119
  8. 2021Neural Temporal Point Processes: A Reviewcited by 113
  9. 2017Modeling The Intensity Function Of Point Process Via Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 93
  10. 2017Wasserstein Learning of Deep Generative Point Process Modelscited by 46
  11. 2018Lecture Notes: Temporal Point Processes and the Conditional Intensity Functioncited by 40
  12. 2020Neural Temporal Point Processes For Modelling Electronic Health Recordscited by 39
12 more
  1. 2015COEVOLVE: A Joint Point Process Model for Information Diffusion and Network Co-evolutioncited by 37
  2. 2018Deep Reinforcement Learning of Marked Temporal Point Processescited by 32
  3. 2022Exploring Generative Neural Temporal Point Processcited by 30
  4. 2020Fast and Flexible Temporal Point Processes with Triangular Mapscited by 28
  5. 2019Self-Attentive Hawkes Processescited by 23
  6. 2020Noise-Contrastive Estimation for Multivariate Point Processescited by 20
  7. 2017SIR-Hawkes: Linking Epidemic Models and Hawkes Processes to Model Diffusions in Finite Populationscited by 17
  8. 2020User-Dependent Neural Sequence Models for Continuous-Time Event Datacited by 17
  9. 2021An Empirical Study: Extensive Deep Temporal Point Processcited by 10
  10. 2017The Multivariate Hawkes Process in High Dimensions: Beyond Mutual Excitationcited by 9
  11. 2022Modeling Inter-Dependence Between Time and Mark in Multivariate Temporal Point Processescited by 7
  12. 2021Interacting Hawkes processes with multiplicative inhibitioncited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 5; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: